The study of 600 UAP cases reported by civilian and military pilots
Most of the results (in percentages) found in this analysis of 600 cases indicating that regardless of the total number of cases analyzed, more or less the same patterns are found. This study confirms the potential impact on aviation safety and the need for a serious study of these UAP phenomena. Only a systematic collection of detailed testimonies from pilots and crews will enhance the scientific research on this enigmatic UAP phenomenon. Summaries of these 600 UAP events are contained in the AIRPANC Catalogue (2nd edition, 2010).
What Is The Shape Of UAPs?
Disc (or circular, saucer, round)
Spherical (Sphere, balloon, orb)
Oval (elliptical, egg)
Cigar (fuselage)
Triangle (delta, flying wing)
Missile (rocket, torpedo, bullet)
Cylindrical
Half-sphere (inverted bowl, half-moon)
Changing (UAP shape changed during observation)
Other shapes (Crescent, banana, mushroom, rectangle)
Type of UAP observed by pilots are classified in two categories:
the “lights” point and
the “objects” when it has a “solid” aspect.
Of 600 reported UAP cases from civilian pilots, they were distributed as follows:
Distribution by type of UAP
Object 443 cases 74%
Light (LT) 156 cases 26%
Unspecified (UN) 1 case
Number of UAP
Of the 600 cases (474 cases – 78%), the witnesses have reported only one UAP.
In 117 cases (20%), pilots reported the sighting of two or more UAPs.
In 12 cases, there were groups of more than 10 UAPs observed at the same time.
UAP estimated altitude
Of 332 UAP cases, the estimated altitudes are distributed as follows:
UAP Estimated Altitude (in feet)
Between 2,000 ft and 4,999 ft 51 cases
Between 5,000 ft and 9,999 ft 89 cases
Between 10,000 ft and 19,999 ft 64 cases
Between 20,000 ft and 29,999 ft 48 cases
Between 30,000 ft and 49,999 ft 53 cases
Between 50,000 ft and 100,000 ft 11 cases
> 100,000 ft 2 cases
Altitude not mentioned 268 cases
In 305 cases, more than half of the cases (51%), the UAP estimated altitude was between 2,000 feet and 50,000 feet. The lowest measured altitude reported by a pilot was 500 feet. The highest UAP altitude reported was 246,000 feet by Major Joe Walker. It happened when he was flying the X-15 rocket-powered aircraft during a test flight at more than 2,000 mph when his rear-view movie camera captured five disc-shaped or cylindrical objects flying in echelon formation in April 1964.
UAP behavior
This classification enables us to attribute a “level of strangeness” or unconventionality to the UAP phenomenon.
Stationary phenomena (one light or one object appearing motionless.)
Phenomena following a uniform/constant trajectory and/or a speed.
Phenomena with a variable trajectory and/or speed (UAP is performing various maneuvers).
Of 600 UAP cases gives the following results.
Anomaly (AN) 39 cases 7%
Flyby (FB) 222 cases 37%
Maneuver (MA) 339 cases 56%
The crew of a Varig C-47 cargo plane witnessed a luminous object. After a quick maneuver, the disc-shaped object was ahead of them and crossed to the right side, following a horizontal trajectory. The UFO stopped for a moment and then abruptly went into a dive and was out of sight in the cloud bank below.
When the UAP reached the right side of the aircraft, the engines began acting up, coughing and missing, and the lights in the cabin dimmed and almost went out. It seemed like the whole electrical system was going to collapse. When the UFO dived into the clouds, everything became normal again. This happened in Brazil in 1957.
Interaction between the UAP and the aircraft
In 299 cases, there have been reported interactions between UAPs and aircraft. These cases concern these events:
UAP performs maneuvers to approach, chase, or escape from the aircraft.
Dogfight with military aircraft.
UAP circles the aircraft or performs maneuvers close it.
Distribution of interaction cases by type of aircraft
Military aircraft (M) 141 cases.
Commercial aircraft (C) 86 cases.
Private aircraft (P) 66 cases Commercial and Military (C+M) 4 cases.
Commercial and private (C+P) 2 cases.
Impact on flight safety
Among the 600 UAP cases, a possible impact on flight safety was noted in 290 cases (48%). These 290 events are distributed by type of aircraft (Commercial, Private, Military, Multiple aircraft cases) as follows:
Commercial aircraft (C) 125 cases 43%
Military aircraft (M) 95 cases 33%
Private aircraft (P) 65 cases 22%
Multiple aircraft : C+M (3) / C+P (2) 5 cases 2%
In some instances, electromagnetic or other effects on aircraft systems were reported when the UFO was close to the aircraft. For 108 events (37%), pilots determined that the impact on flight safety was high enough to submit an Airmiss/Airprox report.
A fast white cylindrical UAP that overflew their plane
During a flight in the USA 1997, three crew members of a B747-300 observed a very fast white rocket-like UAP that overflew their plane between 200 and 400 feet above in the opposite direction. They observed no wing on the UAP, which they described as cylindrical. There was no TCAS9 alert. The UFO passed overhead very fast. The UAP was close enough that the Flight officer ducked his head because he believed it would hit them. It was white and had a round shape to it. There was no smoke or fire noticeable from the object. No radar echo was detected in the aircraft opposite direction by ARTCC. The National Transportation Safety Board has no conclusion concerning the identification of the UAP but considers this case officially closed.
Summary
The study of 600 UAP cases reported by civilian and military pilots has shown a number of key points.
The distribution of cases comes from the whole Earth (Continental and maritime zones).
There are slightly more nocturnal cases (54%) than daylight cases.
Witnesses were two or more in 69% (more than two-thirds) of the cases.
Pilots have officially reported their sightings in 197 cases (33% of the 600 cases).
Commercial pilots have reported their sightings officially in 35% among 233 cases.
Most of the sightings occurred during the cruise phase of flight (85%).
Visual sightings are confirmed by radar detection in 27% of the cases.
More UAP is described as « objects » (74%) than point sources of lights. Circular (disc) is the most reported shape (42%).
Weapon systems were momentarily ineffective when targeting UAP.
UAP performs maneuvers in more than half of the cases (56%), and their behaviors seem to reflect an interaction with the aircraft in almost 50% (299) of the 600 cases.
In 48% (almost half) of the 600 cases, UAP has had or could have had an impact on flight safety, including 31 cases in which pilots had to make an evasive action to avoid a collision with UAP.
Electromagnetic effects were reported in 14% of the 600 cases. Radio and compass systems were the most affected.
Private aircraft are more affected by the E-M effects allegedly caused by UAP.
Did you know that human eyes can see only a short range of light spectrum between 400-700nm? This article is about using and getting the best night goggles to find UFOs.
Here are the best night vision goggles to spot UFOs 2021. Did you know that human eyes can see only a short range of light spectrum between 400-700nm? This article is about using and getting the best night goggles to find UFOs. Do you know that light waves up to 400nm are called ultraviolet light, and light waves over 700nm are named IR-light? And both are not visible by the eyes. Therefore, only the visible range of the spectrum is considered a norm for humans.
Have you been hooked on spending your nights alone looking up at the night sky? But whether you’re tracking UFOs or UAPs on the down-low like Instagramming each satellite you see, you’ll want a great set of UFO spotting night-vision goggles. I’ve been examining night-vision googles in this article, and now I’m ready to tell you what the best ones are.
Finding the best IR goggles
But creativity does not have easy ways. If we cannot see some things, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist—the same thing with UFOs. And by using IR or Night goggles, you can find UFOs, which will be radically different from what you see with your eyes. Using IR goggles requires a lot of time and serious investment in equipment and accessories.
And also, it forces the UFO-spotter to think entirely differently. But it’s worth it, and you will find out many things are buzzing around out there. Not everyone may find using IR interesting, but surely there will be those to whom this article will help make their first steps in this genre.
What Are The Types of Night Vision Goggles?
There are two types of night vision goggles:
Infrared Night Vission Goggle.
Thermal Night Vission Goggle.
1) INFRARED NIGHT VISION GOGGLES
Infrared (IR) night vision goggles rely on the light outside the visible spectrum range to illuminate the images you see in low-light environments. A standard option is green light waves, so numerous night vision goggles rely on a green phosphor. Nevertheless, those night vision goggles cannot work in total darkness or when it is bright outside. Without any light, it’s impossible to produce an image for you to see. And bright light will hurt the technology and make the goggles inoperable.
2) THERMAL NIGHT VISION GOGGLES
As opposed to IR technology, thermal technology relies on temperature and heat detection to produce an image. While the picture isn’t as clear as with infrared night vision goggles. Because those visual displays don’t rely on light and can work in complete darkness. They even work in the absence of light outside of the visible spectrum. If you’re considering a pair of night-vision goggles for hunting UFOs in total darkness, thermal-based models are the best option.
This post contains affiliate links, and as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases that help keep this content free.
What to think about when buying night vision goggles
Let’s examine some of the basics you’ll need in any good IR goggle purchase.
Are They Head Mountable?: This may not be an issue for everyone, but I always want to know if I can wear the goggles on my head and if they come with a strap to do so.
Battery Life: We’re not just talking about how long the batteries will last, but what kind of batteries the goggles need. Some require regular AA batteries others have specialized built-in lithium batteries.
FPS: Nope, not first-person shooter, but frames per second. The higher the frames per second, the better the IR goggles, in theory. I find that 15 is fine, but many other people swear by 30.
What Are The Price range For Night Vision Goggles?
Up to $500: In this price range, you can find a quality pair of uncomplicated goggles with limited functionality designed for casual observing.
$501 to $1,000. In this price range, you’ll find night vision goggles designed for activities such as hunting, driving, or shooting.
$1,001 and up. On the higher price range spectrum, you’ll find high-quality and high-performance goggles, including ones that would qualify as ideal for tactical activities.
What Are The Night Vision Goggle Generations?
Night vision goggle generations are divided into:
Gen 1.
Gen 2.
Gen 3.
Gen 1 night vision goggles are the cheapest, with low resolution and a 75-yard visual range.
Gen 2 night vision goggle models are median-priced and ideal for hunting, shooting, and driving with enhanced optics, light amplification, longer battery life, and a 200-yard visual range.
Gen 3 night vision goggles models are the most expensive but are similar to tactical grades used by U.S. Military special forces with the best battery life and a 300-yard long-range view.
Should you buy Monocular or Binocular?
Monocular night vision goggle models can be ideal for hunting or scouting, whereas a binocular model is best for casual observing.
Here are the best UFO night vision goggles/binocular
The device uses a superior grade CMOS sensor that is IR sensitive. The 4-inch viewing screen gives top-class image clarity. The 4.5x optical zoom and a viewing distance of 1400 feet improve overall effectiveness.
Pros
It can also be used during the daytime like regular binoculars
It can record videos and images with sound
The user interface is well-designed, making it so easy to use
Cons
The rubber around the periphery of the screen can be uncomfortable through prolonged use.
It is not suitable for very close distance viewing
These night-vision goggles use adjustable infrared light to bring out clear images at night and have a nighttime viewing distance of 197 feet. The large LCD screen decreases eye strain and allows for more extended viewing periods.
Pros
User-friendly, tripod-mountable design with three buttons. Increased daytime viewing distance.
Soft, roomy eye caps allow for comfortable viewing.
It allows the user to adjust the brightness to suit the ambient lighting.
This gadget uses 3W infrared LED technology to allow nighttime viewing for up to 820 feet. You can use it to capture pictures and videos, which are typically stored in a micro SD card.
Pros
It comes with a filter cover to reduce glare.
IPX4 is rated for water resistance.
It is also suitable for both day and night use.
It comes fully multi-colored for optimal light transmission.
8GB micro SD card included.
Cons
The focusing knob could be sturdier.
The batteries are sold separately.
The lens isn’t fog proof.
Tips
Bright light sources can work negatively against night vision goggles. To prevent any damage, do not expose it to such light sources.
I hope you enjoyed this short article about the best night vision goggles to spot UFOs. Most people associate night vision goggles with tactical military missions, but they’re ideal for nighttime UFO-hunting trips. This is one of those times that adulting can be fun. Now you can own a wicked pair of night vision goggles instead of just pretending.
We can indeed state that one answer to the many more UFO encounters is the upgrade in the military systems. New advanced radar systems have made these UAPs more visible in the last decades. It started with the upgrade around the F-18 fighter planes in 2004 when the classic USS Nimitz UFO encounter occurred. Since then, many more observable UAPs have been monitored. This might explain the uprise in UFO encounters between the U.S Navy and UAPs.
We now have the tools and the “mindset to report” UFOs. The UFO subject is too interesting to walk away from. And the “burn to subdue” this phenomenon might be boiled down to the pilot sightings or the space tracking radars we have, as it was then called the ballistic missile early warning center system like RAF filing dales in Yorkshire.
And when those sorts of people report ufos and tell you about sightings involving speeds, maneuvers, and accelerations that have them impressed, then it’s exactly the same situation as we’ve seen recently with these people like Commander David Fravor and Alex Dietrich. When these elite men and women, these top guns, when they get excited, I get excited, and you should too.
So what is flying around in our airspace? Who or what is piloting these UAPs? To get a more exact answer to these questions, one must ask oneself whether they are from our planet or elsewhere. If they are Drones from, let’s say, Russia or China, well, then there is a problem with the security of our airspace. But let’s say these crafts are from another world, well, then there is another problem.
I think, though, they might have been here for millennia, and they pose no real threat to our civilization. I think there must be a supervising effort taking place here. But you might oppose this idea and say, well, we might intrude in their environment. But in any case, I don’t think we really have to face any danger from these visitors.
Maybe is this just part of when we discovered the atom bomb and suddenly interfered in their world on a quantum level? Who can tell? But don’t you think it’s strange that they are quite interesting in our atomic weapons capabilities and fly around the nuclear stations and our nuclear hangars?
It’s obvious, even for the blind to see, that they are interested in our atomic energies and our nuclear weapons, don’t you think? We can make sure that they are here to stay, and we have just been able to track those intruders. This seems to be the beginning of a new era in our modern civilization and our thinking about these strange UAPs.
One thing that has caught my mind is that there seems to be an agreement about the size of these drones. They seem to be relatively small, around 40 feet, and for their smaller drones, approximately 20 feet. Is this telling us something about their agendas or capabilities, or even about the sizes for the pilots of their crafts?
Artificial Intelligence To Look For UFOs
Maybe we can use AI, artificial Intelligence to see trends and patterns for these UAPs. For example, look at the Chinese new UAP task force. They are using this new system. Maybe we should too. We can not lag behind China in this part. If we don’t do this, we can not learn so much about these UFOs because they otherwise are impossible to track and find.
One other thing we should focus on is; where do they come from and where do they end up. I hope there is some registration for this in our radar systems, but that will not be released for the public any time soon. Maybe we should get these answers from the government. It would settle the dispute about where they come from and where they are going. It could rule out advanced conventional technologies. Maybe something for “the Black Vault” to look into?
The satellites should be able to reveal these circumstances. But it seems to be a problem to find out who has these secret data and files and information about this. To find this information requires the proper clearances. Another problem seems to be that FOIA might not be enough to track this information because most of the data might be in the private sector.
Are we on the cusp of a Disclosure? Are we getting there? Are we not alone? Are we living this disclosure right now? Is Lue Elizondo part of it. Even President Obama has discussed this, and he was dead straight with this phenomenon. It seems to be a real phenomenon and nothing to be laughed at. All these things are happening right now.
It’s just a realization of the world we are living in. The stigma still exists, but we are getting there to overcome this UFO stigma. I quote Nick Pope “If you see something, you say something.” Because this is a serious defense subject, Nick will give the “Inside perspective” on the UFO topic. “Hope for the best but prepare for the worst.” It’s a sober foundation to have these days.
We will need these insights and experiences to dig a little bit deeper into the UFO enigma. Let’s listen to people like Nick, Lue, and Mellon to continue this UFO topic. I hope you are continuing this journey with me. Thanks for reading, and I hope you come back for more revelations that I will disclose the more I learn.
Who do you trust the most of these UFO influencers?
1. Lue Elizondo
2. Steven Greer
3. Nick Pope
4. Chris Mellon
5. Third Base of the Moon
6. George Knapp
7. Jeremy Corbell
8. David Fravor
9. Alex Dietrich
Please leave a comment below. Have I missed someone? Again thanks for reading this UFO blog. More to come, be sure. Have a great day, UFO friends.
Posted on
What’s about to be revealed in the unclassified UFO report to Congress?
Remember how UFOs used to be laughed at? The subject of conspiracy theories, the topic was part fringe, part sci-fi, with a little bit of innuendo about bodily probing thrown in for good measure. What a difference three years makes! In that time, the narrative has flipped 180 degrees, and the subject has come out of the fringe and into the mainstream. So what changed? As former PM Harold Macmillan is once reported to have said, ‘Events, dear boy, events.
Why you’ll soon be hearing a lot more serious talk about UFOs
Just over three years ago, it was revealed that the conspiracy theorists were right and that the US government really was investigating UFOs, despite the denials and debunking.
While spun as a project to probe next-generation aerospace threats, the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Investigation Program (AATIP) really did look at UFOs – or UAP as they’re known inside government: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.
US Navy pilots have seen them, and military radar operators have tracked these mystery crafts performing speeds, maneuvers, and accelerations that seem to go beyond anything in our own inventory. When news began to leak of this, the US Congress demanded answers. Like the media and the public, they’d been told the government wasn’t researching UAPs, so they were outraged to find out they’d been lied to and that $22million (£16million) had, in fact,,, been spent on all this.
Classified briefings followed, and the super-secret Defense Intelligence Agency wrote to US lawmakers, explaining that AATIP had produced scientific papers covering topics such as anti-gravity, invisibility, wormholes, stargates (apparently there is such a thing), and warp drive. It sounds like science fiction, but it’s there for everyone to see in the Congressional record.
The Senate Intelligence Committee took a particular interest in this. Some of their members received classified briefings and were so concerned that they demanded a formal report. You can read the UFO report here. Their request was written into the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, and asked Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence, for an assessment of UFOs, in exactly the same way that they would ask her for an assessment of the North Korean ballistic missile program.
Her report has been written. Various Congressional committees and sub-committees have already been pre-briefed on the findings. So what’s about to be revealed.
According to leaks from senior US government administration officials who’ve seen the report’s conclusions, the study has found that there’s no definitive evidence that any of the unusual activity is extraterrestrial. But, sensationally, neither has the extraterrestrial hypothesis been ruled out. The report apparently goes on to discuss whether any of this could be attributable to secret prototype aircraft, missiles, or drones – either from the US itself or from a foreign adversary such as Russia or China. The US option has apparently been eliminated (apparently, this isn’t one part of the military blind-testing new toys against another), while Putin and Xi remain in the frame.
So, where do we go from here? Well, for a start, UFOs will never be ridiculed again. We now have military pilots, radar operators, and intelligence community personnel going on the record about this, framing this as a defense and national security issue. Former CIA directors, directors of national intelligence, and even presidents are saying this is real – whatever the true nature of the phenomenon. There’s something flying in our airspace, and we don’t know what it is. Whether we’re skeptics or believers, it’s time to find out.
Over the next few days, there’s going to be a lot of mainstream media coverage of UFOs, with people discussing the unclassified report to Congress and speculating about what’s hidden in the classified annex. One thing’s for sure: the subject of UFOs will never be the same again.
The subject of UFOs and UAPs has been an area of intense research for many years, even decades. I want to share some of Luis Elizondo’s thoughts and observations on this enigmatic subject. Luis Elizondo worked for Advanced Aerospace ThreatIdentification Program (AATIP) since 2008 and was director from 2010 until he resigned in 2017. Despite what looks like a campaign to discredit him, his credentials with AATIP have now been officially confirmed, as has AATIP’s role in investigating UAPs. As well as collecting and analyzing UAP data, AATIP also commissioned scientific studies.
The research titles of 38 of which were published following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 2019, which can be viewed in full HERE but include papers on “Warp Drive, Dark Energy,and theManipulation of ExtraDimensions, “Invisibility Cloaking” and “Traversable Wormholes, Stargates, and Negative Energy.”
The Pentagon is due to publish a report to Congress on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) on or around 25th June, and so we should all know a great deal more about the subject within the next few weeks.
What Luis Elizondo has to say about how UAPs may be powered
It has been proposed that water maybe some sort of simplistic fuel source. When you look at what water is comprised of, primarily hydrogen and oxygen. If you wanted to get a yield of energy, cracking the atom is one way of doing it. The smaller you go into the world of the atom, the more tightly that energy is packaged within the atom and the sub-atomic particles with the atom. And so, if you want to warp space/time, some have theorized that you need a lot, a lot of energy. There are two ways to warp space/time, a lot of mass or a lot of energy, and it turns out that you need a lot, a lot of energy to do it. And if one wanted to harness that energy, perhaps one of the most efficient ways is through hydrogen.
Here is Luis Elizondo’s take on the UAPs “Warp Bubble.”
There is a delta within space/time construct compared to the external environment in which a lot of the observations we see as seemingly extraordinary really aren’t. They are rooted in some of the relativity principles that Einstein proposed in that if you were inside this bubble traveling, what appears to us this incredible capability to maneuver at hypersonic speeds and instantaneous acceleration, and yes, even low observability; in fact, if you were inside that bubble looking out the rest of the world would be going by in slow motion. And so it’s not really. It’s that weird duality where both are actually occurring. Both our existence in this time and the relativity of being in this localized environment where you are insulated where you are no; where the way we experience space/time, there’s a delta, it’s different.
It is safe to say that Luis Elizondo’s best assessment is that UAPs are powered by some kind of advanced nuclear reactor that powers technology that can create a field of warped space/time around it.
Are there differences in behavior traits or skill sets depending on the shape of the UAP?
For example, is a tictac different from a disc or an orb different from a triangle? Are they from the same source, or do they seem completely different?
Luis Elizondo answer: clearly, there are differences, but they’ll be utilizing the same or similar technologies, and the differences between a disc versus a rod, or if you will, a cigar shape and that versus a triangular or even a boomerang may simply be the result of the propulsion that is being used and the intent and purpose of the vehicle.
Let’s say that the warping of space/time in a localized area is finite. Let’s say that you have this bubble that can only be so big. For argument’s sake, let’s say 43 feet; you can only fit a certain size automobile inside that bubble, a vehicle. If you were to have this bubble and create a car that this bubble was surrounding you on all equal sides, the shape of the car you would want to make sure that you uniformly fitted inside this bubble is a sphere because the bubble is a sphere, but a two-dimensional representation is a disc and if you’re driving in a car that is shaped like a disc in this bubble that you want to protect you on all sides equally a disc would be a perfect way to do this.
So, think of a Corvette. You can fit two people in a Corvette. You can go really fast but let’s say a corvette isn’t big enough. Let’s say you need a school bus. You need a lot of people to fit in, and you need a lot of equipment. Well, you could put two of these discs together and have these, if you will, overlapping bubbles. But two discs together, you have now a cigar. Those two discs, you could have a propulsion unit here and here [gestures either end of the cigar]. Now all of a sudden, you’ve got these two bubbles that are still protecting you equally. There’s another shape in geometry that if you needed something really big like an aircraft carrier, let’s say a triangle.
I think a useful analogy here may be one of mankind’s first inventions, the wheel. As everyone knows, wheels are simple machines for reducing the force of friction. Dragging something over rough ground is hard work, but wheels make it much easier by allowing the object to roll along. With one wheel, I could make a wheelbarrow and transport quite a lot of rocks, but with too many rocks, it might become unstable, and I might add a second wheel.
More rocks still and a third wheel might be necessary than a fourth the more weight I carry, the more wheels I need to reduce the friction.
Luis Elizondo suggests a maximum diameter of the Warp Bubble at a suspiciously specific but possibly mischievous 43ft. The formula for the volume of a sphere is V = 4/3 πr³ which would mean the volume of a Warp Bubble with a diameter of 43ft would be 41629.77ft³.
Regardless of whether 43ft is accurate and based on classified data and observations or not, there would likely come the point when it is more efficient and stable to have another Warp Bubble than continue to increase the power needed to expand one Warp Bubble’s diameter.
Thanks for reading this article. If you found this useful then please share. If you want to know who Lue Elizondo is, head over to this article. Who is Luis Elizondo?
In June 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and other agencies are scheduled to deliver unclassified reports on UAPs to Congress. The US military has confirmed the authenticity of several videos and images showing encounters with unidentified flying objects feeding questions about what the Pentagon knows about such UFO incidents and others like them.
Next month, the report that will be delivered to Congress is the outcome of a provision in the $2.3 trillion coronavirus relief and appropriations bill that Former President Donald Trump signed in 2020. The requirement called for a “detailed analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena data and intelligence” from the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, and the FBI.
The (DoD) Department of Defense’s watchdog is also set to investigate how the Pentagon has handled reports of UFOs. More questions will be announced in the near future on how these encounters were handled in recent years.
Sen. Marco Rubio says, “I want us to take it seriously and have a process to take it seriously,” Christopher Mellon, a defense official who served in the administrations of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, stated more needs to be done, adding that the process for reporting UFO sightings should be destigmatized.
Is it Aliens?
The US government acknowledges that UFOs are real. US Navy pilot Commander David Fravor says, “As I got close to the tic tac, it rapidly accelerated to the south and disappeared in less than two seconds.”
Luis Elizondo, the retired head of a classified DoD program to research potential UFOs/UAPs, said in 2017 that he personally thinks “there is very compelling evidence that we may not be alone.” He continues, “These aircraft, we’ll call them aircraft, are performing characteristics that are not currently within the US inventory neither in any foreign inventory that we are aware of.”
What will the upcoming UFO report reveal?
Many continue to stay skeptical that the upcoming report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and other agencies will present a comprehensive look at the UFO issue.
And according to Luis Elizondo, “Best case scenario – there’s an interim report that will meet the intent of Congress with a promise to provide another report following this one.” He continues saying, “Unfortunately, there’s a lot more we don’t know than we do know. The good news is that we’re finally taking UAPs seriously.”
Harry Reid, Luis Elizondo, and others who have pushed for the government to release more information about UAPs say materials that have been released so far only scratch the surface of what is known.
Next month, the Pentagon’s UFO research group, also called the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, will go public with a UAP report requested by Congress. And no matter what that report brings, it will change anyone’s mind.
Is these UAPs Chinese, or is it Russian? Could it be their technology? And if it is, then they’re way ahead of the rest. What are your thoughts?
French authorities declared 2014; they had detected “drones” over two nuclear power plants, the latest in a baffling series of UAP incidents across the country. The size matches the latest spherical UFO incident with USS Omaha. A spokesperson for security forces said: “Drone-type machines overflew two nuclear plants during the night.”
Enigmatic, seemingly coordinated drones appeared in 2014 over several nuclear power stations in France. A spokeswoman for EDF has confirmed the incidents, which she said happened around 9 pm local time over plants at Penly in northern France and Golfech in the southwest.
They don’t know who is behind them. But perhaps the most crucial question they should ask is whether these now widespread incidents pose a threat to nuclear facilities. UFO “Drone flights” were first reported over at least 13 nuclear facilities in October 2014.
The Size Match The Latest UFO Incident With USS Omaha
USS Omaha. Credit: Wikipedia.
The flights have taken place often at night, involving UAP “drones” of different sizes and capabilities. They range from smaller models that would need to be operated within the immediate vicinity to larger ones around two meters in length, controlled from kilometers away. The latest UFO encounter with USS Omaha was size about 2 meters (about 6 feet). Is there a similarity? Are they the same drones/UAPs?
Flights have been carried out both in solitude and concurrently, with drones flown simultaneously over nuclear facilities hundreds of miles apart. And at this point, it is unclear who is behind them and, crucially, what their intentions and capabilities are.
The drone fights are in breach of the 2.5km no-fly zones, which protect the air space around French nuclear power plants. The actors and intentions behind the French drone cases still remain a mystery.
Greenpeace, who has previously flown a paraglider over a nuclear plant in France, denies any involvement, according to BBC 31 Oct 2014. So, who is flying those “drones” UAPs? What are your thoughts? Please leave a comment.
The U.S. Navy has been unobtrusively developing what could be one of the most important, transformative, and fascinating advances in naval warfare combat, and warfare in general, in years. This latest electronic warfare “system of systems” has been clandestinely refined over the last years. Can this new system explain recent UFO sightings?
NEMESIS and Unmanned Vehicles
The secretive latest electronic warfare “ecosystem” is known as Netted Emulation of Multi-Element Signature against Integrated Sensors, or NEMESIS. It first emerged in Navy Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Budget Item Justification documents in the service’s budget proposal for the 2014 Fiscal Year, published in April 2013.
Furthermore, US Navy has been developing and combining multiple types of unmanned vehicles, countermeasures and electronic warfare payloads, shipboard and submarine systems, and communication technologies to give it the ability to project what are phantom fleets of aircraft, ships, and submarines.
UAP/UFO Decoys
These realistic-looking artificial decoys and signatures have the ability to appear seamlessly across diverse, and geographically separated enemy sensor systems positioned both below and above the ocean’s surface. And as a result, this networked and cooperative electronic warfare concept delivers an unprecedented level of guileful fidelity to the warfare. It’s not simply about disrupting the enemy’s capabilities or even confusing them at a command and control level, yet also about making their sensors tell them the same misrepresentations across large swathes of the battlespace.
Performing so achieves a cohesive set of far more powerful, unified, and convincing effects. This sounds like science fiction, but it is anything but. It is the next quantum leap in the quiet but ferocious struggle to control the invisible domain of electronic warfare.
Although it is the least visible part of a present-day military’s order of battle and overall abilities, and much of the details of precisely what capabilities exist and how they are realized resides in the shadows, electronic warfare is becoming one of the most critical aspects of modern warfare. And as a result, future combat will occur just as much in this invisible spectrum as the visible one.
So, this might explain many of the strange high-performance characteristics ships and planes sometimes detect by radar. Because at beyond visual range during these UFO incidents likely are the result of electronic warfare. Things like rapid accelerations in speed and sudden drops in altitude on radar represent fundamental tenets of electronic warfare tactics. The NEMESIS program can also explain these UFO encounters and is this what Navy pilots had encountered off America’s eastern seaboard.
Summary
Maybe a foreign power like China or Russia is actively using what could be described as some elements similar to what could be found in the NEMESIS ecosystem to collect critical intelligence on America’s most advanced sensor systems and. Nevertheless, this doesn’t mean everything the Navy aircrews saw off the east coast was these capabilities, though it seems like a glaringly obvious explanation for most of them, and it is far more so now.
In the case of the east coast UFO/UAP events, for instance, the high-performance capabilities of those objects were never visually observed, but they were seen on radar. The visual UAP encounters describe balloon-like objects doing balloon-like things—not moving fast at all—while other objects feature performance more similar to drones than anything else. There you have it. It might just be Electronic military warfare in combination with drones.
What is a UFO/UAP? It is also known as Unidentified Flying Object. Learn the history behind this enigmatic phenomenon. An unidentified flying object (UFO) is also called a flying saucer. Today is also labeled UAP or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) It can be any aerial object or optical phenomenon not readily identifiable to the observer. UFOs became a significant subject of interest following the evolution of rocketry after World War Two. They were thought by some researchers to be intelligent extraterrestrial life visiting Earth.
What is the history of UFOs?
It all started in 1947 when a search-and-rescue pilot named Kenneth Arnold reported nine “saucer-like things…
The picture below shows pilots E.J. Smith, Kenneth Arnold, and Ralph E. Stevens look at a photo of an unidentified flying object they sighted while en route to Seattle, Washington, 1947. Credit: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images.
Credit: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images.
Project Blue Book and “Flying Saucers”
The first historical UFO sighting happened in 1947 when businessman and private pilot Kenneth Arnold claimed to see nine high-speed objects near Mount Rainier in Washington while flying his small plane, a CallAir A-2. Arnold calculated the crescent-shaped objects’ speed as several thousand miles per hour and said they moved “like saucers skipping on water.” The newspaper report that followed was mistakenly stated that the objects were saucer-shaped, consequently the term “flying saucer.“
Locations of Kenneth Arnold’s plane and the sighted UFOs
On June 24 in 1947, the fascination with UFOs began when a private pilot from Idaho, Kenneth Arnold, described seeing nine objects “flying like a saucer would” along the crest of the Cascades.
The UFOs arrived from the direction of Mount Baker. They then passed in front of Mount Rainier and Mount Adams in the space of 1 min. 42 s. The 47 mi or 76 km distance. And if measured peak to peak, suggests a speed of 1,650 mph or 2,660 km/h, similar to Kenneth Arnold’s estimate of 1,700 mph or 2,700 km/h. This far exceeds that of the record-holding P-80 jets of the time.
Sightings of UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) increased, and in 1948 the U.S. Air Force launched an investigation of these UFO reports called Project Sign. The involved with the initial project opinion was that the UFOs or UAPs were most likely advanced Soviet aircraft. Some researchers proposed that they might be alien spacecraft from other worlds, the so-called ETH or (extraterrestrial hypothesis).
But within a year, Project Sign was succeeded by another project, namely Project Grudge, which in 1952 was replaced by the longest-lived of the official examinations into UFOs, Project Blue Book, headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. It ran from 1952 to 1969. Project Blue Book collected UFO reports of more than 12,000 sightings or events. Each of which was ultimately classified as:
Identified – with a known astronomical, atmospheric, or artificial (human-caused) phenomenon
Unidentified
The latter category, approximately six percent of the total, involved cases for which there was insufficient data to identify a known phenomenon.
The Robertson Panel and the Condon Report
An American fascination with the UFO phenomenon was underway. In the warm summer of 1952, an alluring series of radar and visual sightings happened near National Airport in Washington, D.C. However, those events were attributed to temperature inversions in the city’s air. But not everyone was satisfied by this explanation.
While the number of UFO reports had risen to a record high, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) prompted the U.S. government to establish a scientists’ expert panel to investigate the phenomena. H.P. Robertson headed the committee. He was a physicist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California, and included other physicists, a rocket engineer, and an astronomer.
The Robertson Panel gathered for three days in 1953 and questioned military officers and the head of Project Blue Book. They further reviewed films and photographs of UFOs. Their conclusions were that:
Ninety percent of the sightings could be attributed to astronomical and meteorologic phenomena (e.g., bright planets, stars, balloons, meteors, auroras, ion clouds) or such earthly objects as aircraft, birds, and searchlights.
There was no apparent security threat.
There was no evidence to back the Extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).
Portions of the panel’s report were kept classified until 1979, and this long period of secrecy boosted fuel suspicions of a government cover-up.
Another committee was set up in 1966 at the Air Force’s request to examine the most interesting material collected by Project Blue Book. And two years later, this committee, which made a detailed study of 59 UFO sightings, published its results as Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, known as the Condon Report, named after Edward U. Condon, the physicist who supervised the investigation.
The Condon Report was reviewed by a select committee of the National Academy of Sciences. A total of 37 scientists composed chapters or parts of chapters for the report, which covered investigations of the 59 UFO sightings in great detail. Same as the Robertson Panel, this committee concluded that there was no evidence of anything other than common phenomena in the reports and that UFOs, or UAPs, did not warrant further investigation. This, together with a drop in sighting activity, led to the end of Project Blue Book in 1969.
This post may contain affiliate links, and as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases that help keep this content free.
Other investigations of UFOs/UAPs
Despite the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) failure to make headway with the expert committees, a few engineers and scientists, most notably Professor J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, had been involved with projects Grudge, Sign, and Project Blue Book. He concluded that a small fraction of the most reliable UFO reports gave definite indications for the presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
Allen Hynek founded CUFOS, or the Center for UFO Studies, which continues to investigate the UAP phenomenon. Another significant U.S. study of UFO/UAP sightings was the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP). It was a secret project that ran from 2007 to 2012. Luis Elizondo was the AATIP program director. When the existence of the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was made public on December 16, 2017, the most newsworthy aspect of this project was a report that the U.S. government held materials, alloys, and compounds purportedly attained from UAPs/UFOs that were unidentifiable. Still, today many scientists remained skeptical about this astonishing claim.
Professor J. Allen Hynek.
Aside from the American works, the only other official and relatively complete records of UFO/UAP sightings were kept in Canada, where they transferred those in 1968 from the Canadian Department of National Defense to the Canadian National Research Council.
The Canadian records contained approximately 750 sightings. Less-complete records have been maintained in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Greece, and Australia. In the United States, the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) and the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) in Bellvue, Colorado, continue to log UAP sightings reported by the public.
In the Soviet Union, sightings of UFOs and UAPs were often prompted by tests of secret military rockets. In order to obscure the true nature of the tests, the government sometimes encouraged the public’s belief that these rockets might be extraterrestrial craft but eventually decided that the descriptions themselves might give away too much information. UFO sightings in China have been similarly provoked by military activity that is unknown to the public.
Probable explanations for UFO sightings and alien abductions
UFO/UAP reports have varied widely in reliability, as judged by the number of witnesses, whether the observers were independent of each other, the observing conditions (e.g., fog, haze type of illumination) the direction of the sighting. Typically, witnesses who take the trouble to report a UFO sighting consider the object to be of ET (extraterrestrial) origin or maybe a military craft but unquestionably under intelligent control. This judgment is usually based on what is perceived as formation flying by sets of objects, unnatural—often sudden motions, the lack of any sound, brightness or color changes, and exotic shapes.
That the unaided eye plays tricks sometimes is well known. For example, a bright light, such as the planet Venus, frequently appears to move. Astronomical objects can also be problematic to drivers, as they seem to “follow” the car. Visible impressions of UFOs’ distance and speed are also highly unreliable because they are based on an assumed size and are frequently made against a blank sky with no background object (clouds, mountains, etc.) to set a maximum distance.
Reflections from eyeglasses and windows can similarly produce superimposed views. Moreover, complex optical systems, such as camera lenses, can turn point sources of light into seemingly saucer-shaped phenomena. Such optical illusions and the psychological wish to interpret images are known to account for many observed UFO/UAP reports and at least some UFO sightings are known to be hoaxes. Radar sightings, while in some respects more reliable, fail to discriminate between artificial objects and meteor trails, rain, ionized gas, or thermal discontinuities in the atmosphere.
“Contact events,” such as abductions, are quite often associated with flying saucers or UFOs. Because they are ascribed to extraterrestrial visitors. However, the credibility of the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) as an explanation for abductions is disputed by most psychologists who have investigated this phenomenon. They suggest that a common experience is known as “sleep paralysis” may be the culprit, as this causes sleepers to experience temporary immobility and a belief that they are being watched.
How UAPs are potentially “unidentifiable”
Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) or Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) activism and social psychology are difficult to convey just how information becomes misconstrued dealing with this delicate subject. There is an unhealthy need for a certain mindset of people to associate UAP/UFO with something extraterrestrial and for other people to label the phenomenon to earthly objects.
For such people, the issue is simplistic. It’s either weather balloons or aliens. It’s white, or it’s black. It’s us, or it’s not. In reality, though, it’s more of a meshed, greyish color that is infinitely complex in scope and practice.
Real UFO/UAP objects that are anomalous and display ‘beyond next-generation technology, such as those that encountered the Black Aces squadron, flew out of the USS. Nimitz carrier strike group or the USS. Roosevelt, aren’t misidentified planes, birds, balloons, or stars.
They are a true mystery that science hasn’t been able to explain appropriately. Sadly, due to the Department of Defense (DOD) classification, which is placed upon UFO/UAP cases’ specific dynamics, a problem arises. Issues stem from reduced transparency and have meant that videos and case reports can’t even be made public via FOIA. This creates an opportunity for misinformation.
And from a psychologist’s perspective, when sensitive objective data is absent, it often becomes filled with personal needs and interpretations. It’s a flawed part of being a human being and clinically talking. Such tendencies aren’t rational and help develop the delicate ego, which looks to protect itself at all costs. Facts and verifiable sources are pulled apart, analyzed, and projected for the conscious mind to carry forward into behaviors.
The individual has a narrative, with an inevitable reality they need to have subjectively upheld and ensure that only certain truths are objectified. This is no different for ‘believers’ or ‘skeptics’ who apply the same tactics on either side of the spectrum.
What about the UFO facts?
It’s a fact that these strange UFOs are being picked up on many sensors from the United States military and also by the world’s most advanced defense technology. We can verify that through several Navy Pilots, Intelligence Officers, Radar Operators, Directors of various agencies, and senators updated in classified briefings.
Take the recent UFO/UAP videos in the media. The DoD has determined them to be “Unidentified” in classification. This means that after a careful assessment by an official investigative body, for example, The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force or UAPTF, they have been unable to determine the nature and origin of such anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV).
Here are the new UAP/UFO photographs from Mystery Wire that’s been going viral on Twitter. The U.S. Intelligence Community has known about the mysterious object for two years.
Arguably, the complexity of whatever this AAV/UFO/UAP technology might be may reach far beyond the oversimplified concept of extraterrestrials and into something else, something more alarming. Maybe it’s an effect of nuclear activity, perhaps something genuinely unidentifiable. Maybe something from the multiverse, or perhaps it’s something that the animalistic human mind might not imagine in its original form. Then again, perhaps it’s none of the above.
However, this is all hypothetical. We are stuck in neutral on this UFO topic due to society’s twofold thinking that unfortunately includes renowned scientists tasked with finding “alien” life. Indeed a genuinely scientific approach says, “I don’t know what this UFO phenomenon is, so let’s investigate.”
Instead of taking this topic on what is being reported, the discussion becomes about trying to prove or disprove the stigmatized (ET) extraterrestrial concept rather than focus on likely national security or quantum physics problem, a possible problem of revolutionary technology.
The Pentagon’s UAP
Franc Milburn of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies published this exceptionally insightful assessment of the USG’s new UAP investigation. It’s called “The Pentagon’s UAP Task Force.” And he’s done a meticulous job reviewing the open-source literature and is asking the right questions.
UFO reports in media
When a report on “UFOs” makes the news cycle, more often than not, the well-meaning journalist calls up the sole astrophysicist whose name has become attached to this issue for an uninformed quote.
Regularly, the astrophysicist says it’s all misidentifications, nothing to see here. The “U” in UFO means “Unidentified,” it’s all ballons, birds, and planes while cherry-picking data to create a narrative that we shouldn’t bother with such things.
What might psychology tell us in such cases? Some say that when funding and reputation are put on the line, the mind will create a less hostile version of reality. It is suitable for the status quo but poor for unbiased scientific methodology and arguably a disaster for those seeking possible non-human intelligence.
A new article broke into the Sunday Times with journalist Sarah Baxter making it to page 18 with details of the Pentagon UAP/UFO report. This article, faced with a bleak picture of two people dressed as aliens, was well written and included some of the current issues of UFO/UAP, quoting Harvard scientist Avi Loeb. He has attributed an interest to the (ET) extraterrestrial concept.
But, Baxter failed to mention some of the comments from Navy Pilots and Senators on the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence. My positive critique would be framing the issue, with the undertone hung up on the twofold argument of ETs, rather than stepping back from such premature conclusions.
Overall, it was quite good. I was pleased to see the coverage in a credible British media outlet, and for the first time, it was a promising start into this alternative UFO world. But as Sarah soon will find out over the next two years, it won’t be the last.
Are UFOs/UAPs from China?
Also, I should mention how Chinese technology’s framing would seem to be the following rational and logical explanation for anyone unfamiliar with what has happened over the past three years.
How likely are the claims that ordinary misidentifications are what Navy Pilots are reporting? How accurate is it to think that a foreign advanced technology is responsible for what we are witnessing?
And could the Chinese possess this technology as far back as 2004 without being reported anywhere in the next seventeen years?
A British historian who has investigated and authored articles for The Debrief and UAPMedia. His book on flight aviation within the former Soviet Union has recently got the attention of those working on the UFO/UAP issue. He has written at length about the capabilities and tracking abilities of modern-day fighter planes.
He states that he hasn’t got the actual figures because they’ll be classified. He continues that the FLIR/IRST (InfraRed Search and Track) system and the PIRATE (Passive InfraRed Airborne Track Equipment) produced by the EUROFirst consortium for Eurofighter Typhoon is thought to be able to find stealth aircraft such as the famous B-2 at significant distances. Those flight testing started in 2000 or 2001, and the first Typhoon fitted with PIRATE flew in 2007.
It is essential to keep in mind. We now live in a world where many Navy Pilots have come forward with statements and videos, complete with various Radar Operator’ testimony on multiple sensory data from AN-SPY1 radar and collect data from satellites. All this is according to the former Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe.
US military can now “detect” UAPs
We are talking about sensory detection that is amazingly detailed and sophisticated. And since the 1969 closure of the United States Air Force UFO program, Project Blue Book, the military’s technological capacity to identify objects in sensitive airspace has dramatically increased.
The US military can now detect and track various airborne objects using different sensory information, especially when engaging nuclear strike groups. It’s always astonishing that people think the three things in those blurry UFO/UAP/AAV videos just somehow eluded the military with no tracking as if they flew away without the military knowing what happened to them. It’s unbelievable how many of those people are also unaware those objects were tracked over days rather than minutes.
New advanced radar systems can now detect UFOs
Picture showing the AN/SPY-1 radar antennas are the light grey octagonal panels on the front and starboard side of the superstructure of USS Lake Erie. Credit: Wikipedia.
Available numerical figures on the SPY-1 detection range claim that it can distinguish a golf ball-sized target at ranges above 165 km. When applied to a ballistic missile-sized target, the SPY-1 radar is supposed to have a range of 310 km. All this information according to “Missile Defence Advocacy Agency.”
The military reconnaissance satellites under the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) are so incredibly sophisticated. They can see five inches or more prominent on the ground from space. We are talking particularly incredible surveillance technology backed by hyper-advanced radar systems that trace each of the geographic spheres that are layered up towards space.
Still, here we have three fuzzy, black and white videos from the gun camera footage of the U.S Navy Pilots planes. But that is what’s in the public domain. However, there might be more that is clear and close up. Yet, they are kept in a secret vault somewhere.
UAP/UFO journalist Danny Silva
So when we talk about UFOs that wander into the most surveillance airspace in the world and later leave without any issue or interference and then officially remain classified as “Unidentified,” we are not talking swamp gas, birds, balloons, or the tail end of another plane. The researcher and civilian UAP/UFO journalist Danny Silva implied that Seth Shostak’s opinions aren’t correct.
The Testimony of Dave Fravor on UFOs
Commander Dave Fravor.
We have the famous testimony of Commander Dave Fravor. Mr. Shostack brushing off Commander Fravor’s expert testimony and comparing Navy Jets to Hondas is ludicrous. There is no compelling argument the Tic-Tac UFO is a conventional plane.
Many top mainstream journalists agree the Tic-Tac is either secret black projects, advanced technology, secret programs, the likes of which the world has never seen, or something else. So, moving forward, the public will remain privy to more UAP cases, as we have now seen with the USS. Kidd. It will be tough to continue to deny the reality of advanced technology, no matter where it comes from, in our skies and bodies of water, among other places.
And I would agree, if you want to apply subjective Occam’s Razor, arguably look to newly advanced Chinese technology, not planes which DOD can identify instantly.
Nevertheless, keep in mind Occam’s Razor is highly dependent on the information available to you. Given the reports, we highly likely aren’t talking about the next advancement of the F-18. We are discussing technology so radical it has mastered trans-medium travel, anti-gravity, and hypersonic dead-stop propulsion. Look to the AATIP five observables for a proper understanding of such UFO technological capabilities.
The red-taped, bureaucratic UFO dogma
Currently, we are red-taped, lost in bureaucratic dogma that stops progression. The lack of detailed classification regarding these specific UAP vehicles is problematic. UFO/UAP can mean anything from a drone, balloon, planes, birds, missiles, or anything that seemingly flies.
There is nothing to distinguish objects seen in the famous GIMBAL video from the FLIR1. The absence of specification allows for misinformation to spread, thriving in the uncertainty and lack of transparency to force their narrative.
To guarantee we sidestep unhelpful opinions from misinformed scientists and radicalized YouTube debunkers, we must assure we don’t conclude without all the relevant data. Equivalently, we mustn’t name the phenomenon as one thing or another without a full government investigation.
Luis Elizondo former director of AATIP
Luis Elizondo.
The former Director of the Pentagon program (AATIP), Luis Elizondo, was asked about the breakdown in the scientific process regarding UFO/AAV/UAP technology.
He said that his great respect for the scientific community could not be overstated. Thus, he continues, so AATIP had some of the best in conducting the analysis, scientific modeling, and mathematical computations. He finds it egregious when some well-known scientific community scientists display unwarranted intellectual arrogance on a topic they have no idea about. He also said, rather than allowing the scientific method to speak for itself, they muzzle her and talk for her. So it amazes Luis how in breath, someone claims to look for signs of ET life in the solar system but is unwilling to look right under their noses. He states that it seems to him to be a bit hypocritical.
The term “Advanced Aerospace Vehicles” (AAV)
The question is now how to manage such misinformation? And from now on, the obvious answer is the transparency of government data and ending the secrecy. Moreover, it has been suggested that the term UAP or UFO is replaced with something that represents the genuine bizarre nature of the phenomenon and the observed technology and the genuinely unidentifiable quality that separates the misidentified UAPs from the identifiable.
Furthermore, when the intelligence agents provided information to The New York Times last summer (2020), they used the term Advanced Aerospace Vehicles (AAV). Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough quickly squashed to Swedish researcher Roger Glassel, who said that AAV was not an official Navy term. It was possibly the contractor BAASS that complied with the Nimitz Incident report for AATIP.
She was assuring the discussion of AAV, and the concept of unidentifiable craft stopped in its tracks. The Pentagon did not want to allow that unidentifiable ideology to exist under their ruling. Some will claim this was a strategic move, given that the USS. Nimitz Incident report released in 2018 by reporter George Knapp used the term AAV – shut down AAV and shut down the Nimitz Incident report.
Moreover, AAV was a term associated with the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) contractors, as it was reported by The New York Times in July 2020.
Provided the New York Times a series of unclassified slides revealing that the secret program took this seriously to include it in numerous briefings. One slide states one of the program’s tasks was to “arrange for access to Data/reports/ materials from crash retrievals of AAVs,” or advanced aerospace vehicles. New York Times sources told them that “AAV” does not refer to vehicles made in any country. Not Russian or Chinese, but it is used to mean technology in the truly unexplained realm. They also assure that their briefings are based on facts, not belief.
The mainstream media has been aware oF UFO/UAP
The recent comments of John Lee Ratcliffe, an American politician and attorney who worked as the Director of National Intelligence from 2020 to 2021, the mainstream media, have been aware that UFO/UAP is being taken seriously by the DOD with a report due to the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence (SSCI) in summer 2021.
And with public pressure and people now knowing the UFO/UAP technology reality, that might prove disastrous should DoD try to cover it up at this point.
Senators on the records and their conclusion
Senators Marco Rubio and Warner have gone on record to verify the Navy pilot’s reports stating that they do not know what is flying around nuclear strike groups.
A severe issue to national security was that the Pentagon established an inter-agency Task Force (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force) that was created to investigate UAP/UFOs and compile the much-anticipated report to congress. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force is taking into consideration all possibilities. Even those who are burdened with psychological stigma and pushback.
But with everything happening right now, we need to be cautious. Because not everyone is willing to accept UAP, UFO, or AAV as a reality, the only possible way forward is data transparency, reducing the wriggle room for intellectual dishonesty. It all starts with ending UFO/UAP secrecy within society and government.
Should the search for extraterrestrial life in the universe come up empty-handed, it might be worth checking in on a neighboring universe instead. According to a pair of studies in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, there’s a fair chance that life-fostering planets could exist in a parallel universe.
The notion that the universe is just one of many, perhaps infinite, other universes is known as the multiverse theory. Experts have previously thought that such parallel universes if they exist, would have to meet a stringent set of criteria to allow for the formation of stars, galaxies, and life-fostering planets like those seen in our universe.
Researchers ran a massive computer simulation in the new study to build new universes under various starting conditions. They found that life conditions might be a little broader than previously thought.
