I don’t think anyone in the UFO community should rule out Jeremy Corbell and his UAP photos/Films of the “pyramid-shaped UFOs.” There is a truth of the matter to all this if you look into what he is telling the audience/listeners and what is mentioned in his blogs about this phenomenon on his homepage. Find out why I think it’s like this in this article.
Who is Jeremy Corbell?
Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell is an American contemporary artist and documentary filmmaker based in Los Angeles, California. He is also a mixed media artist whose exhibitions combine art, film, and fashion. Moreover, he is also an author, photographer, and fashion designer.
Jeremy Corbell.
Background
On May 1st, 2020, a classified briefing was generated about the UFO/UAP presence via the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). They include details presented in a series of classified intelligence briefings to educate Defense personnel on UFO/UAP matters.
This UAP briefing was a build-on to a previous ONI briefing, generated October 18th, 2019. Both were distributed across a wide range of intelligence networking platforms (such as SIPRNet, JWICS, and various Intelink systems). The USS Russell observed and recorded multiple “pyramid” shaped UAPs.
Note that the objects are said to be hovering about 210 meters (700 ft) above the destroyer. The crew of the USS Russell filmed the UFOs off the coast of San Diego in July 2019, and they involved Strike Group 9 within the Warning areas off of San Diego.
If you listen carefully to his words in official appearances in different shows and forums like YouTube podcasts, you can clearly hear him states that he is aware of the “UFO-debunkers” out there. It’s easy to listen only to the debunkers. Still, when you take a closer look into his alleged UAP film, especially the released “Pyramid-shaped” clip, you can obviously see that the optical phenomenon that produces this artifact, also known to photographers bokeh, is really not the case. He didn’t “pull out the word Pyramid from the ether,” according to himself (see source podcast). It was given to him, and this statement was according to the intelligence briefings he received.
Here Are 6 Reasons Why You Should NOT Rule Out Jeremy Corbell Claims About the Pyramids-UFOs.
1. When you listen to Jeremy, he clearly states that this “Pyramid-UFO” is captured from different sources and different angles.
2. Did you see that the flag post in this short “Pyramid-UFO” clip from Jeremy Corbell? It’s still in focus when the debunkers claim it’s all a “bokeh” effect. And this is why those UFOs look like Pyramids. Furthermore, the clouds are also in focus. Think about that.
3. According to Jeremy, several witnesses claim that there are three “pyramid-shaped” objects, and they watch and film these UFOs from different angles.
4. The UFOs were not known from any “black projects” and not triangular-shaped stealth crafts (see link podcast).
5. The UAPs were blinking. The blinking effect could be due to a strobe light from a possible “stealth helicopter on the ship’s Helicopter-pad. Or a “task-light, a red strobe, on the destroyer.
6. One UFO-Pyramid seems to be blinking, but the other two UAPs are not. It could indicate that one is just coming from the reflections from the reasons mentioned above. (see no.5).
According to Susan Gough, Pentagon Spokesperson, the UAPTF has included the incident in their ongoing examinations.”
Furthermore, take a closer look at the three images of the Pyramid-shaped UFOs. Do they really match up with the released video clip he released? I don’t think so. Again these are six reasons why you should not rule out Jeremy Corbell in the UFO community.
What is bokeh?
Bokeh effect. Credit: Wikimedia.
Bokeh or blur occurs in all regions of an image that are outside the depth of field. The name comes from the Japanese word boke (暈け or ボケ), which means “blur” or “haze”, or boke-aji (ボケ味), the “blur quality”.
The larger the lens aperture, the greater the bokeh, each point of light out of focus becomes a disc, or it takes the form of the aperture of the screen that blocks the passage of light through the camera lens.
Summary
I hope you take Jeremy Corbell as a reliable source for the continuation of the enigmatic UAP/UFO topic and take him seriously and not in a bad way like some in the community want. I think there is more to this man than many might think. Listen to the facts, and you will discover this also. So, with those words, I will conclude this blog. I hope you have found this article interesting and that next time when you listen to Jeremy Corbell, don’t count him out.
Jeremy Corbell Hints About a Recent UFO Event
What is Corbell suggestion here link below? Are there new videos (20 videos) he received about this new UFO event over a military facility? What are your thoughts?
For over five decades, SETI, or the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, has almost exclusively focused on watching the sky for signals that could represent a distant advanced alien civilization. However, for as many years, scientists have quietly considered the possibility that evidence for advanced alien life could be closer than we realize in the form of remnants or artifacts. Some claim to have already found compelling evidence for artificial extraterrestrial artifacts or relics in the analysis of existing imagery.
Mainly thanks to technological advances, in recent years, some scientists have slowly started coming forward and saying that the hunt for alien artifacts is something that deserves serious consideration.
The Moon is ideal for preserving trace evidence of artificial relics
This post may contain affiliate links, and as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases that help keep this content free.
In 2011, physicist Dr. Paul Davies and researcher Robert Wagner of Arizona State University authored a paper suggesting that photographic mapping captured by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter could be used to search for potential alien artifacts on the lunar surface.
Dr. Paul Davies described that the conditions on the Moon are ideal for preserving trace evidence of artificial relics or, in other words, alien artifacts. Because our Moon is almost inert, and objects and features on the surface are preserved for an immense duration. Eventually, the Moon material thrown up by meteor impacts erases records, but a large object on the lunar surface might remain detectable for tens of millions of years. All this according to Dr. Paul Davies, who also authored the book: The Eerie Silence: Are We Alone in the Universe?
Alien artifacts could be lying about in our celestial neighborhood
Furthermore, Dr. Haqq-Misra, astrobiologist and research scientist at Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, also points out that NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has captured voluminous numbers of high-resolution images of Mars. He said, “There are thousands of such images, and so it is possible that an anomalous artifact could be captured in such images without anybody noticing yet.”
Outside of the Moon and Mars, scientists know even less about the surfaces of other bodies in our solar system.
In a 2012 paper entitled: On the Likelihood of Non-Terrestrial Artifacts in the Solar System, Dr. Haqq-Misra and NASA physicist Dr. Ravi Kumar Kopparapu stated the lack of comprehensive analysis ultimately makes it impossible to say just how likely it is or isn’t that alien artifacts could be lying about in our celestial neighborhood. “We cannot place very strong limits on the absence of extraterrestrial technology in the solar system until we perform more complete analyses to rule out such possibilities,” stated Dr. Haqq-Misra.
Machine learning to detect surface relics
He points to advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning as ways that might help the search for anomalies in existing surface imagery.
One such technique, discussed in a paper published in early 2020, revealed that researchers could successfully apply unsupervised distributed machine learning to detect surface anomalies in remote sensing and space science. And this approach could conceivably detect artifacts on the lunar surface that would not have been easily noticed by naked eye analysis.
However, any artifacts that are camouflaged or covered in dust would not be possible to detect through such machine learning analysis, according to Dr. Haqq-Misra.
While the Department of Defense’s sudden willingness to discuss sightings of mysterious or unexplained aerial objects is intriguing, scientists involved in the hunt for alien artifacts want to make sure it’s abundantly clear until more definitive evidence is provided; their pursuits are not associated with the search for UFOs.
In this article, I will dig into the interesting Allen Hynek. Learn what he thought about the UFO phenomenon. Allen Hynek (Born on May 1, 1910 – Died on April 27, 1986). He was an American professor and astronomer. Hynek was very well known for also being a ufologist. But he is perhaps best remembered for his UFO research. Allen Hynek acted as a scientific advisor to UFO studies undertaken by the U.S. Air Force. This was under two projects named: Project Sign (1947–1949) and Project Blue Book (1952–1969).
He conducted his own independent UFO research in later years, developing the “Close Encounter” classification system. Allen was among the first people to conduct scientific analysis of reports, especially trace evidence purportedly left by UFOs.
Allen Hynek Early Life
Allen was born in Chicago to Czech parents. In 1931, he received a B.S. from the University of Chicago. Later, In 1935, he completed his Ph.D. in astrophysics at Yerkes Observatory. Furthermore, in 1936 Allen Hynek joined the Department of Physics and Astronomy at The Ohio State University. He later specialized in the study of stellar evolution and the identification of spectroscopic binary stars.
Dr j Allen Hynek Career
Throughout World War II, Hynek was a civilian scientist at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, where he served to develop the United States Navy’s radio proximity fuze.
And after the war, he returned to the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Ohio State, rising to full professor in 1950. In 1953, Allen proposed a report on the fluctuations in starlight and daylight’s brightness and daylight, highlighting daytime observations.
Moreover, In 1956, he left to join Professor Fred Whipple, the Harvard astronomer, at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, coupled with the Harvard Observatory at Harvard. Allen had the duty of directing the tracking of an American space satellite, a project for the International Geophysical Year in 1956 and after that.
In addition to over two hundred teams of amateur scientists worldwide that were part of Operation Moonwatch, there were also twelve photographic Baker-Nunn stations. A special camera was devised for this job, and a model was built and tested and then stripped apart again when, on October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1.
After finishing his work on the satellite program, Allen went back to teaching. He was taking the professor and chairman of the astronomy department at Northwestern University in 1960.
Allen Hynek And His Skepticism
In response to many reports of UFOs or “flying saucers,” the United States Air Force established Project Sign in 1948 to investigate sightings of those UFOs or unidentified flying objects. Allen Hynek was contacted to act as a scientific consultant to Project Sign. He examined UFO reports and determined whether the enigmatic phenomena described therein suggested known astronomical objects. So, when Project Sign hired Hynek, he was skeptical of those UFO reports.
Allen Hynek assumed that they were made by unreliable witnesses or persons who had misidentified human-made or ordinary objects. In 1948, He said that “the whole subject seems utterly ridiculous” and described it as a fad that would soon pass. Moreover, in his 1977 book, Hynek said that he enjoyed his role as a debunker for the Air Force. He also confesses that debunking was what the Air Force expected of him.
This post may contain affiliate links, and as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases that help keep this content free.
Allen Hynek Change of Opinion
In April 1953, Allen wrote a report for the Journal of the Optical Society of America titled “Unusual Aerial Phenomena,” which included one of his famous statements – “Ridicule is not part of the scientific method, and the people should not be taught that it is. The steady flow of UFO reports, often made in concert by reliable observers, raises scientific obligation and responsibility questions.”
Ans – “Is there any residue that is worthy of scientific attention? If there isn’t, does not an obligation exist to say so to public, not in words of open ridicule but seriously, but to keep faith with the trust the public places in science and scientists?”
Moreover, in 1953, Allen Hynek was an associate member of the Robertson Panel, which concluded nothing strange about UFOs. A public relations campaign should be undertaken to debunk the UFO subject and reduce the public interest. Allen would later regret that the Robertson Panel had helped make UFOs a disreputable field of study.
As UFO reports remained to be made, some of the statements, particularly by military pilots and police officers, were very puzzling to Allen. Hynek once said, “As a scientist, I must be mindful of the lessons of the past; because all too often it has happened that matters of great value to science were overlooked because the new UFO phenomenon did not fit the accepted scientific outlook of the time.”
Furthermore, in a 1985 interview, when asked what caused his change of opinion, he responded, “Two things. One was the entirely negative and recalcitrant attitude of the Air Force. They wouldn’t give UFOs the possibility of existing even if they were flying up and down the street in broad daylight because everything had to have a profound explanation.
Allen began to resent that, even though I felt the same way because he still thought they weren’t going about it in the best way. Allen thought he couldn’t assume that everything is black, no matter what. Furthermore, the caliber of the witnesses began to trouble him. Quite a few instances were reported by military pilots and he knew them to be pretty well-trained, so this is when Allen first began to think that maybe there was something to all UFO sightings.
Allen remained with Project Sign after it became Project Grudge (though he was far less involved in Grudge than in Sign). Project Grudge was later replaced with Project Blue Book in 1952, and he remained a scientific consultant. The US Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, Blue Book’s first director, held Allen in high regard: “He was one of the most impressive scientists I met while working on this UFO project, and I met a good many. Hynek didn’t do two things that some of those involved did: give you the answer before Allen knew the question, or immediately begin to expound on his accomplishments in the field of expertise and science.”
Though Allen thought Ruppelt was a competent director who steered Project Blue Book in the right direction, Ruppelt headed Blue Book for just a few years. Allen has stated his opinion that after Ruppelt’s departure, Project Blue Book was little more than a public relations exercise, moreover noting that little or no research was undertaken using the scientific method.
Allen began occasionally quarreling publicly with the results of Blue Book. By the early 1960s, after about a decade and a half of study, Clark records that “Allen’s apparent turnaround on the UFO question was an open secret.” Just after Blue Book was formally dissolved, did he speak more openly about his “UFO-turnaround” Allen considered that his personality was a factor in the Air Force keeping him on as a consultant for over two decades.
Some other ufologists thought that Allen was dishonest or even duplicitous in his turnaround. Physicist James E. McDonald wrote to Allen in 1970, admonishing him for what McDonald saw as his lapses. He was suggesting that, when evaluated by later generations, retired Marine Corps Major Donald E. Keyhoe would be viewed as a more objective, honest, and scientific ufologist.
Throughout the late stages of Blue Book in the 1960s, Allen began speaking openly about his disagreements and disappointments with the Air Force. Amongst the causes about which he openly disagreed with the Air Force were the highly advertised Portage County UFO chase. Numerous police officers chased a UFO for half an hour. And the encounter of Lonnie Zamora, the police officer who reported a UFO encounter with a metallic, egg-shaped aircraft near Socorro, New Mexico.
Moreover, in March 1966 in Michigan, two days of mass UFO sightings were reported and got significant publicity. After examining the reports, Hynek offered a provisional hypothesis for some of the sightings: a few about hundred witnesses had mistaken swamp gas for something more spectacular.
At the press conference where he announced, Allen repeatedly and energetically stated that swamp gas was a likely explanation for only a portion of the Michigan UFO reports and not for UFO reports in general. But much to his dismay, Allen’s qualifications of his hypothesis were largely ignored, and the term swamp gas was repeated ad infinitum concerning UFO reports. The explanation was subject to national scorn.
In his reply dated October 7, 1968, to a request for scientific recommendations regarding Blue Book from Colonel Raymond Sleeper, commander of the USAF Foreign Technology Division, Allen noted that Blue Book suffered from numerous procedural problems and a lack of resources, which rendered its efforts “totally inadequate.” He also noted that one wag had bestowed Blue Book the epithet of “Society for the Explanation of the Uninvestigated.”
Allen Hynek, founder of the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS)
Allen Hynek was the founder and first head of the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). They were founded in 1973 in Evanston, Illinois (but now based in Chicago). CUFOS advocates for scientific analysis of UFO cases. CUFOS’s extensive archives include valuable files from civilian research groups such as NICAP, one of the most famous UFO research groups of the 1950s and 1960s.
Posted on
The Leaked UFO Photos From US Navy
Leaked photos and videos of UFOs or UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) taken in 2019 were legitimate and were taken by US Navy personnel. The Defence Department confirmed this. Pentagon spokeswoman Sue Gough authenticated to CNN that the photos and video of triangle-shaped UFOs, blinking and moving fast through the clouds, were taken by US Navy staff.
US Navy personnel took pictures of three UFOs, categorized as a “sphere,” metallic blimp,” and “acorn.” The defense department can not comment further on the observations or examination, added Gough.
“Metallic blimp,” “Sphere,” and “Acorn.”
The Pentagon released three short, enigmatic videos in April last year, showing ‘unidentified aerial phenomena, or UFOs. Earlier, the US Navy had verified the clips as accurate. The UAP videos released by the Pentagon date back to 2004 and 2015 and show flying objects that cannot be easily identified. The UFOs in question were moving rapidly and were also captured by infrared cameras.
Moreover, in December last year, former President Donald Trump had signed the $2.3 trillion coronavirus relief bill. He additionally set into motion a 180-day countdown for the authorities to reveal all they know about UFOs.
Furthermore, according to President Trump’s move, the Secretary of Defence and DIA were given less than six months to present information on these enigmatic UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) to Congress and committees of armed services.
The report must also pinpoint any potential threats to national security posed by UFOs while attempting to analyze whether they may involve any of the adversaries in these sightings of UFOs. Almost on cue, America’s secret agency CIA allowed all UAP information to be downloaded ahead of the deadline.
The CIA approved documents to be accessed by downloading from the Black Vault website. The data involved every instance of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), which the US government has mapped. Are you interested in more UFO topics? Then head over to my new article named: Can New Electronic Warfare Explain UFO Sightings?
The U.S. Navy has been unobtrusively developing what could be one of the most important, transformative, and fascinating advances in naval warfare combat, and warfare in general, in years. This latest electronic warfare “system of systems” has been clandestinely refined over the last years. Can this new system explain recent UFO sightings?
NEMESIS and Unmanned Vehicles
The secretive latest electronic warfare “ecosystem” is known as Netted Emulation of Multi-Element Signature against Integrated Sensors, or NEMESIS. It first emerged in Navy Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Budget Item Justification documents in the service’s budget proposal for the 2014 Fiscal Year, published in April 2013.
Furthermore, US Navy has been developing and combining multiple types of unmanned vehicles, countermeasures and electronic warfare payloads, shipboard and submarine systems, and communication technologies to give it the ability to project what are phantom fleets of aircraft, ships, and submarines.
UAP/UFO Decoys
These realistic-looking artificial decoys and signatures have the ability to appear seamlessly across diverse, and geographically separated enemy sensor systems positioned both below and above the ocean’s surface. And as a result, this networked and cooperative electronic warfare concept delivers an unprecedented level of guileful fidelity to the warfare. It’s not simply about disrupting the enemy’s capabilities or even confusing them at a command and control level, yet also about making their sensors tell them the same misrepresentations across large swathes of the battlespace.
Performing so achieves a cohesive set of far more powerful, unified, and convincing effects. This sounds like science fiction, but it is anything but. It is the next quantum leap in the quiet but ferocious struggle to control the invisible domain of electronic warfare.
Although it is the least visible part of a present-day military’s order of battle and overall abilities, and much of the details of precisely what capabilities exist and how they are realized resides in the shadows, electronic warfare is becoming one of the most critical aspects of modern warfare. And as a result, future combat will occur just as much in this invisible spectrum as the visible one.
So, this might explain many of the strange high-performance characteristics ships and planes sometimes detect by radar. Because at beyond visual range during these UFO incidents likely are the result of electronic warfare. Things like rapid accelerations in speed and sudden drops in altitude on radar represent fundamental tenets of electronic warfare tactics. The NEMESIS program can also explain these UFO encounters and is this what Navy pilots had encountered off America’s eastern seaboard.
Summary
Maybe a foreign power like China or Russia is actively using what could be described as some elements similar to what could be found in the NEMESIS ecosystem to collect critical intelligence on America’s most advanced sensor systems and. Nevertheless, this doesn’t mean everything the Navy aircrews saw off the east coast was these capabilities, though it seems like a glaringly obvious explanation for most of them, and it is far more so now.
In the case of the east coast UFO/UAP events, for instance, the high-performance capabilities of those objects were never visually observed, but they were seen on radar. The visual UAP encounters describe balloon-like objects doing balloon-like things—not moving fast at all—while other objects feature performance more similar to drones than anything else. There you have it. It might just be Electronic military warfare in combination with drones.
The Air Force program “Project Blue Book” was the code name set up in 1952, after numerous UFO sightings during the Cold War. Thousands of UFO reports were collected, analyzed, and filed. And while Allen Hynek was involved, Project Blue Book collected reports of 12,618 sightings of UFOs (unidentified flying objects), of which 701 remain unexplained to this day. They officially ended Project Blue Book on January 19, 1970. The mystery of the mysterious UFOs is still far from solved, and that not enough was being done to address that problem almost fifty years since the close of Project Blue Book.
What Was Project Blue Book Main Goals?
To determine if UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects) were a threat to national security.
To scientifically analyze UFO-related data.
The (AATIP) or Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which began in 2007, offered a glimpse into a comparable scenario today: military cases being investigated and filmed without the public knowing.
J. Allen Hynek Blue Book’s Scientific Consultant
The prominent astronomer J. Allen Hynek was recruited as Blue Book’s scientific consultant and was initially assigned to explaining away flying saucers (UFOs) as natural phenomena or mistaken identifications. But he slowly realized that the strange objects were real and needed further scientific study.
General Nathan Twining
This all began in 1947. Lt. General Nathan Twining, who was Air Materiel Command commander, sent a secret memo on “Flying Discs” to the Army Air Forces commanding general at the Pentagon. General Twining said, “the phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.”
Furthermore, the silent, disc-like objects demonstrated “extreme rates of climb, maneuverability, and motion which must be considered evasive when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar.”
Project Sign
A new UFO project, code-named “Sign,” based at Wright Field (now Wright-Patterson Air Force Base) outside Dayton, Ohio, was given the commission to collect UFO reports and evaluate whether the enigmatic phenomenon was a threat to national security. With former Russia ruled out as the source, the staff of project Sign wrote a top-secret “Estimate of the Situation,” finding that, based on the evidence, UFOs most likely had an interplanetary origin.
General Hoyt Vandenberg, the Air Force chief of staff. Credit: Wikipedia.
According to government officials, the estimate was discarded by General Hoyt Vandenberg, the staff’s Air Force chief. The off-planet hypothesis’s proponents lost ground, with Vandenberg and others insisting that they could find conventional explanations.
Project Sign later evolved into Project Blue Book, intending to convince the public that it could explain flying saucers.
Still, behind the scenes, authorities wrestled with something sobering: well-documented UFO encounters included multiple trained observers, photographs, radar data, marks on the ground, and physical effects on airplanes and humans.
Maj. Gen. John Samford
Maj.Gen. John Samford. Credit: Wikipedia.
In 1952, the office of Maj. Gen. John Samford, the Air Force director of intelligence, briefed the FBI, saying it was “not entirely impossible that the objects sighted may be ships from another planet.
After Air Force planes scrambled to intercept glowing UFOs observed and picked up on radar over Washington in 1952, Samford called a news conference to calm the nation.
Maj. Gen. Samford’s stated that they had analyzed between 1,000 and 2,000 reports and that most had been explained. “However,” he admitted, a certain percentage of the UFO sightings, “have been made by credible observers of relatively incredible things. It is this group of observations that we now are attempting to resolve.”
CIA’s Involvement In UFOs
H. Marshall Chadwell, the assistant director of scientific intelligence for the CIA, concluded in a memo about the UFOs to the Director of Central Intelligence, the head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the other intelligence agencies in the United States, Walter Bedell Smith, that “sightings of unexplained objects (UFOs) at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles.”
Furthermore, Chadwell feared that the Soviets could plant UFO reports as a psychological warfare exercise to sow “mass hysteria and panic.” By 1953, authorities were concerned that communication channels were becoming clogged by hundreds of UFO reports. Even false alarms could be dangerous, defense agencies worried since the Soviets might take advantage of the situation by simulating or staging a UFO wave and then attack.
The CIA devised a plan for a “national policy” to what should be told the public regarding the UFO phenomenon to “minimize the risk of panic.” The CIA issued a secret report recommending a broad educational program for all intelligence agencies, with the aim of “training and debunking.”
The use of actual cases showing first the ‘mystery’ and then the ‘explanation’ would be forceful,” the report said. Debunking “would be accomplished by mass media such as television, motion pictures, and popular articles.”
The plan involved using advertising experts, psychologists, amateur astronomers, and even Walt Disney cartoons to create propaganda to decrease public interest. And civilian UFO groups should be “watched” because of their “great influence on mass thinking if widespread sightings should occur.”
CIA’s legacy endures in the aura of ridicule surrounding UFO reports, inhibiting scientific progress. “The implication in the CIA report was that UFOs were a nonsense (nonscience) matter, to be debunked at all costs,” Allen Hynek wrote. “It made the subject of UFOs scientifically unrespectable.”
J. Allen Hynek, the former UFO skeptic, eventually concluded that UFOs were a real phenomenon in urgent need of scientific attention, with hundreds of cases in the Blue Book files still unexplained. Many of the “closed” UFO cases were resolved with ridiculous, often infuriating explanations, and sometimes by J. Allen Hynek himself.
When Blue Book ended in late 1969, the Air Force flatly lied to the American people, issuing a fact sheet claiming that no UFO had ever been a threat to national security; that UFOs did not describe “technological developments or principles beyond the range of present-day scientific knowledge”; and that there was no evidence that UFOs were “extraterrestrial vehicles.”
The Conclusions of Project Blue Book
No single UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force has ever given any indication of threat to the national security
There has been no proof submitted to or discovered by the Air Force that UFO-sightings categorized as “unidentified” represent technological developments or principles ahead of the range of present-day scientific knowledge
Finally, there has been no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as “unidentified” are extraterrestrial vehicles.
The briefings for members of Congressional committees revealed that not much has changed since the ending of Project Blue Book. Scientists and experts may know more about the behavior and characteristics of UFOs and are much closer to understanding the physics of how the technology operates about these UAPs/UFOs, according to AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) interviews and documents. However, the government still attempts to keep UFO investigations and conclusions secret while denying citizens’ involvement.
This article will reveal some high-level officials’ military, generals, astronauts, presidents, and top government officials’ opinions and statements on the UFO topic. I will include pictures and their famous quotes in unique infographics. Please share those with friends and others that are into this enigmatic matter.
Statements From Government and Military On The Record About UFO
Who is General Nathan Twining?
Nathan Farragut Twining was a U.S Air Force general born in Monroe, Wisconsin. Twining was Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force from 1953 until 1957 and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1957 to 1960. He was the first member of the Air Force to serve as Chairman.
General Nathan Twining was a distinguished “mustang” officer, rising from private to four-star general and promotion to the most distinguished post in the United States Armed Forces in the progression of his 45-year career.
President Harry S. Truman On UFOs
Harry S. Truman was born May 8, 1884, Lamar, Missouri, U.S.—died December 26, 1972, in Kansas City, Missouri. He was the 33rd president of the United States and served as the President from 1945 to 1953, succeeding upon the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Truman led United States through the final stages of World War II. Through the early years of the Cold War, he also led the U.S, vigorously opposing Soviet expansionism in Europe.
President Harry Truman directed Secretary of Defense James Forrestal to set up Operation Majestic Twelve, a blue-ribbon, a top-secret panel headed by Vannevar Bush, a leading Manhattan Project figure and inventor of the Memex machine, a predecessor of the modern-day computer.
Hermann Oberth On UFO Topic
Hermann Julius Oberth was born on 25 June 1894 – died on 28 December 1989. An Austro-Hungarian-born German physicist and engineer. Hermann is considered one of the founding fathers of rocketry and astronautics, alongside the famous French Robert Esnault-Pelterie, the leading Russian Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, and the prominent American Robert Goddard.
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Oberth offered his opinions regarding UFOs (unidentified flying objects). He was a follower of the extraterrestrial hypothesis for the origin of the UFOs seen from Earth. Moreover, in an article in The American Weekly magazine of 24 October 1954, Oberth declared, “It is my thesis that flying saucers are real and that they are space ships from another solar system. I think that they possibly are manned by intelligent observers who are members of a race that may have been investigating our Earth for centuries.”
Oberth also wrote an article in the second edition of Flying Saucer Review titled “They Come From Outer Space.” Hermann considered the history of reports of “strange luminous objects” in the sky, suggesting that the earliest historical case is of “Shining Shields” reported by Pliny the Elder. He wrote, “Having weighed all the pros and cons, I find the explanation of flying discs from outer space the most likely one. I call this the “Uraniden” hypothesis because, from our viewpoint, the hypothetical beings appear to come from the sky (Greek – ‘Uranos’).”
He eventually came to work for his former student, Wernher von Braun, who was developing space rockets for NASA in Huntsville, Alabama.
Wernher von Braun. Credit: Wikipedia.
Delmer Stater Fahrney UFO Statement
Navy Admiral Delmar Fahrney, American naval officer, aeronautical engineer. Navy Admiral Delmar S. Fahrney. He was the former head of the Navy’s guided-missile program holder patents on aircraft, guided missile developments. Decorated Legion of Merit; awarded a commendation for work on guided missiles Bureau Aeronautical; recognition for radio control achievements United States Navy, 1938, 41; Gold star in lieu 2d Legion of Merit, 1957; for development of assault drone guided missile.
Navy Admiral Delmar Fahrney, 1957 public statement. “Reliable reports indicate there are objects coming into our atmosphere at very high speeds and controlled by thinking intelligence.”
General Benjamin Chidlaw, US Eastern Air Defense, Air Defense Command on UFO
General Benjamin Wiley Chidlaw was born on December 18, 1900 – died on February 21, 1977. He was an officer in the United States Air Force. Benjamin directed the development of the United States’ original jet engine and jet aircraft. He entered the United States Army Air Service in 1922 and for many years served in training and engineering positions.
Moreover, in 1940 he was chief of the Experimental Engineering Branch and connected with the development of jet engines. During World War II, Benjamin was deputy commander of the 12th Tactical Air Command. Furthermore, he later organized the establishment of the 22nd Tactical Air Command in the European Theater of Operations.
After the war, Chidlaw remained in senior command positions. He finished his career with the USAF in 1955 as commander in chief of the Continental Air Defense Command. He held the rank of general.
President, Jimmy Carter on UFOs
President Carter describing an alleged UFO sighting he had in October of 1969 to reporters while campaigning in 1976.
“I am convinced that UFOs exist because I have seen one. It was the darndest thing I’ve ever seen. It was big, it was very bright, it changed colors and it was about the size of the moon. We watched it for ten minutes, but none of us could figure out what it was. One thing’s for sure, I’ll never make fun of people who say they’ve seen unidentified objects in the sky. If I become President, I’ll make every piece of information this country has about UFO sightings available to the public and the scientists.”
President Richard M. Nixon on UFO Topic
Richard Milhous Nixon was the 37th president of the United States, serving from 1969 to 1974. Moreover, he previously served as the 36th vice president from 1953 to 1961, after rising to national prominence as a representative and as a senator from California. Nixon was a member of the Republican Party.
“I’m not at liberty to discuss the governments’ knowledge of extraterrestrial UFOs at this time. I am still personally being briefed on the subject!” President Richard M. Nixon.
President Ronald Reagan 1974 UFO Encounter
Ronald Wilson Reagan was an American politician. He was the 40th president of the United States. Reagan was president from 1981 to 1989 and became a highly influential voice of modern conservatism. Moreover, before his presidency, he was a famous Hollywood actor and union leader before serving as the 33rd governor of California from 1967 to 1975.
Reagan described his 1974 UFO encounter to veteran newsman Norman C. Miller, then Washington bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal.
“I looked out the window and saw this white light. It was zigzagging around. I went up to the pilot and said, Have you ever seen anything like that? He was shocked, and he said, “Nope.” And I said to him: “Let’s follow it!” We followed it for several minutes. It was a bright white light. We followed it to Bakersfield, and all of a sudden, to our utter amazement, it went straight up into the heavens. When I got off the plane, I told Nancy all about it.”
Mikhail Gorbachev and UFOs
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev is a Russian and former Soviet politician. Gorbachev as the eighth and last leader of the Soviet Union. Furthermore, he was the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1985 until 1991.
“The phenomenon of UFOs does exist, and it must be treated seriously.” – Mikhail Gorbachev.
Gordon Cooper and UFO
Leroy Gordon “Gordo” Cooper Jr., Born on March 6, 1927 – died on October 4, 2004. Gordon was an American aerospace engineer, test pilot, United States Air Force pilot. Moreover, he was the youngest of the seven original astronauts in Project Mercury, the first human space program of the United States.
He learned to fly as a child and after service in the United States Marine Corps during World War II. Cooper was commissioned into the United States Air Force in 1949. And after serving as a fighter pilot, Cooper qualified as a test pilot in 1956 and was selected as an astronaut in 1959.
Brigadier General Thomas Dubose
Brigadier General Thomas Dubose, Commanding Officer of Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Born 1902 – died February 24, 1992. He was a Brigadier General in the United States Air Force and served as Chief of Staff of the 8th Air Force. Moreover, he was a veteran of World War II and the Korean War. Dubose was awarded the Legion of Merit and the Bronze Star.
“After the plane from Roswell arrived with the material I asked the base commander to personally transport it in a B-26 to Major General McMullen in Washington DC. The entire operation was conducted under strictest secrecy. The weather balloon explanation for the material was a cover story to divert the attention of the press”.
Astronaut Cady Coleman UFO
Catherine Grace “Cady” Coleman is an American chemist, a former United States Air Force colonel. She is also a retired NASA astronaut. Coleman is a veteran of two Space Shuttle missions. Moreover, she left the International Space Station on 23 May 2011 as a crew member of Expedition 27 after logging 159 days in space.
“Mission control, We have a UFO pacing our position, request instructions!” Astronaut Cady Coleman NASA transmission shuttle mission STS-73.
Commander Eugene Cernan, Commander of the Apollo 17 Mission
Gene Cernan was an American astronaut, fighter pilot, naval aviator, electrical engineer, and aeronautical engineer. Moreover, during the Apollo 17 mission, Cernan became the eleventh person to walk on the Moon. He stated in LA TIMES, 1973, “I’ve been asked about UFOs, and I’ve said publicly I thought they were somebody else, some other civilization.”
Charles Camarda Astronaut NASA on UFO
Charles Joseph “Charlie” Camarda is an American engineer and a NASA astronaut. He flew his first mission into space on board the Space Shuttle mission STS-114. Camarda served as Senior Advisor for Engineering Development at NASA Langley Research Center. “In my official status, I cannot comment on ET contact. However, personally, I can assure you, we are not alone!”
Apollo 14 Astronaut Edgar Mitchell on UFO
Edgar Dean Mitchell was a United States Navy officer and aviator. Moreover, he was a test pilot, aeronautical engineer, ufologist, and NASA astronaut. He was the Lunar Module Pilot of Apollo 14. Furthermore, Mitchell spent nine hours working on the Moon’s surface in the Fra Mauro Highlands region. He was the sixth person to walk on the lunar surface. He stated the following; “We all know that UFOs are real. All we need to ask is where do they come from, and what do they want?”
What is a UFO/UAP? It is also known as Unidentified Flying Object. Learn the history behind this enigmatic phenomenon. An unidentified flying object (UFO) is also called a flying saucer. Today is also labeled UAP or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) It can be any aerial object or optical phenomenon not readily identifiable to the observer. UFOs became a significant subject of interest following the evolution of rocketry after World War Two. They were thought by some researchers to be intelligent extraterrestrial life visiting Earth.
What is the history of UFOs?
It all started in 1947 when a search-and-rescue pilot named Kenneth Arnold reported nine “saucer-like things…
The picture below shows pilots E.J. Smith, Kenneth Arnold, and Ralph E. Stevens look at a photo of an unidentified flying object they sighted while en route to Seattle, Washington, 1947. Credit: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images.
Credit: Bettmann Archive/Getty Images.
Project Blue Book and “Flying Saucers”
The first historical UFO sighting happened in 1947 when businessman and private pilot Kenneth Arnold claimed to see nine high-speed objects near Mount Rainier in Washington while flying his small plane, a CallAir A-2. Arnold calculated the crescent-shaped objects’ speed as several thousand miles per hour and said they moved “like saucers skipping on water.” The newspaper report that followed was mistakenly stated that the objects were saucer-shaped, consequently the term “flying saucer.“
Locations of Kenneth Arnold’s plane and the sighted UFOs
On June 24 in 1947, the fascination with UFOs began when a private pilot from Idaho, Kenneth Arnold, described seeing nine objects “flying like a saucer would” along the crest of the Cascades.
The UFOs arrived from the direction of Mount Baker. They then passed in front of Mount Rainier and Mount Adams in the space of 1 min. 42 s. The 47 mi or 76 km distance. And if measured peak to peak, suggests a speed of 1,650 mph or 2,660 km/h, similar to Kenneth Arnold’s estimate of 1,700 mph or 2,700 km/h. This far exceeds that of the record-holding P-80 jets of the time.
Sightings of UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) increased, and in 1948 the U.S. Air Force launched an investigation of these UFO reports called Project Sign. The involved with the initial project opinion was that the UFOs or UAPs were most likely advanced Soviet aircraft. Some researchers proposed that they might be alien spacecraft from other worlds, the so-called ETH or (extraterrestrial hypothesis).
But within a year, Project Sign was succeeded by another project, namely Project Grudge, which in 1952 was replaced by the longest-lived of the official examinations into UFOs, Project Blue Book, headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. It ran from 1952 to 1969. Project Blue Book collected UFO reports of more than 12,000 sightings or events. Each of which was ultimately classified as:
Identified – with a known astronomical, atmospheric, or artificial (human-caused) phenomenon
Unidentified
The latter category, approximately six percent of the total, involved cases for which there was insufficient data to identify a known phenomenon.
The Robertson Panel and the Condon Report
An American fascination with the UFO phenomenon was underway. In the warm summer of 1952, an alluring series of radar and visual sightings happened near National Airport in Washington, D.C. However, those events were attributed to temperature inversions in the city’s air. But not everyone was satisfied by this explanation.
While the number of UFO reports had risen to a record high, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) prompted the U.S. government to establish a scientists’ expert panel to investigate the phenomena. H.P. Robertson headed the committee. He was a physicist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California, and included other physicists, a rocket engineer, and an astronomer.
The Robertson Panel gathered for three days in 1953 and questioned military officers and the head of Project Blue Book. They further reviewed films and photographs of UFOs. Their conclusions were that:
Ninety percent of the sightings could be attributed to astronomical and meteorologic phenomena (e.g., bright planets, stars, balloons, meteors, auroras, ion clouds) or such earthly objects as aircraft, birds, and searchlights.
There was no apparent security threat.
There was no evidence to back the Extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).
Portions of the panel’s report were kept classified until 1979, and this long period of secrecy boosted fuel suspicions of a government cover-up.
Another committee was set up in 1966 at the Air Force’s request to examine the most interesting material collected by Project Blue Book. And two years later, this committee, which made a detailed study of 59 UFO sightings, published its results as Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, known as the Condon Report, named after Edward U. Condon, the physicist who supervised the investigation.
The Condon Report was reviewed by a select committee of the National Academy of Sciences. A total of 37 scientists composed chapters or parts of chapters for the report, which covered investigations of the 59 UFO sightings in great detail. Same as the Robertson Panel, this committee concluded that there was no evidence of anything other than common phenomena in the reports and that UFOs, or UAPs, did not warrant further investigation. This, together with a drop in sighting activity, led to the end of Project Blue Book in 1969.
This post may contain affiliate links, and as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases that help keep this content free.
Other investigations of UFOs/UAPs
Despite the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) failure to make headway with the expert committees, a few engineers and scientists, most notably Professor J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, had been involved with projects Grudge, Sign, and Project Blue Book. He concluded that a small fraction of the most reliable UFO reports gave definite indications for the presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
Allen Hynek founded CUFOS, or the Center for UFO Studies, which continues to investigate the UAP phenomenon. Another significant U.S. study of UFO/UAP sightings was the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP). It was a secret project that ran from 2007 to 2012. Luis Elizondo was the AATIP program director. When the existence of the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was made public on December 16, 2017, the most newsworthy aspect of this project was a report that the U.S. government held materials, alloys, and compounds purportedly attained from UAPs/UFOs that were unidentifiable. Still, today many scientists remained skeptical about this astonishing claim.
Professor J. Allen Hynek.
Aside from the American works, the only other official and relatively complete records of UFO/UAP sightings were kept in Canada, where they transferred those in 1968 from the Canadian Department of National Defense to the Canadian National Research Council.
The Canadian records contained approximately 750 sightings. Less-complete records have been maintained in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Greece, and Australia. In the United States, the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) and the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) in Bellvue, Colorado, continue to log UAP sightings reported by the public.
In the Soviet Union, sightings of UFOs and UAPs were often prompted by tests of secret military rockets. In order to obscure the true nature of the tests, the government sometimes encouraged the public’s belief that these rockets might be extraterrestrial craft but eventually decided that the descriptions themselves might give away too much information. UFO sightings in China have been similarly provoked by military activity that is unknown to the public.
Probable explanations for UFO sightings and alien abductions
UFO/UAP reports have varied widely in reliability, as judged by the number of witnesses, whether the observers were independent of each other, the observing conditions (e.g., fog, haze type of illumination) the direction of the sighting. Typically, witnesses who take the trouble to report a UFO sighting consider the object to be of ET (extraterrestrial) origin or maybe a military craft but unquestionably under intelligent control. This judgment is usually based on what is perceived as formation flying by sets of objects, unnatural—often sudden motions, the lack of any sound, brightness or color changes, and exotic shapes.
That the unaided eye plays tricks sometimes is well known. For example, a bright light, such as the planet Venus, frequently appears to move. Astronomical objects can also be problematic to drivers, as they seem to “follow” the car. Visible impressions of UFOs’ distance and speed are also highly unreliable because they are based on an assumed size and are frequently made against a blank sky with no background object (clouds, mountains, etc.) to set a maximum distance.
Reflections from eyeglasses and windows can similarly produce superimposed views. Moreover, complex optical systems, such as camera lenses, can turn point sources of light into seemingly saucer-shaped phenomena. Such optical illusions and the psychological wish to interpret images are known to account for many observed UFO/UAP reports and at least some UFO sightings are known to be hoaxes. Radar sightings, while in some respects more reliable, fail to discriminate between artificial objects and meteor trails, rain, ionized gas, or thermal discontinuities in the atmosphere.
“Contact events,” such as abductions, are quite often associated with flying saucers or UFOs. Because they are ascribed to extraterrestrial visitors. However, the credibility of the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) as an explanation for abductions is disputed by most psychologists who have investigated this phenomenon. They suggest that a common experience is known as “sleep paralysis” may be the culprit, as this causes sleepers to experience temporary immobility and a belief that they are being watched.
How UAPs are potentially “unidentifiable”
Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) or Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) activism and social psychology are difficult to convey just how information becomes misconstrued dealing with this delicate subject. There is an unhealthy need for a certain mindset of people to associate UAP/UFO with something extraterrestrial and for other people to label the phenomenon to earthly objects.
For such people, the issue is simplistic. It’s either weather balloons or aliens. It’s white, or it’s black. It’s us, or it’s not. In reality, though, it’s more of a meshed, greyish color that is infinitely complex in scope and practice.
Real UFO/UAP objects that are anomalous and display ‘beyond next-generation technology, such as those that encountered the Black Aces squadron, flew out of the USS. Nimitz carrier strike group or the USS. Roosevelt, aren’t misidentified planes, birds, balloons, or stars.
They are a true mystery that science hasn’t been able to explain appropriately. Sadly, due to the Department of Defense (DOD) classification, which is placed upon UFO/UAP cases’ specific dynamics, a problem arises. Issues stem from reduced transparency and have meant that videos and case reports can’t even be made public via FOIA. This creates an opportunity for misinformation.
And from a psychologist’s perspective, when sensitive objective data is absent, it often becomes filled with personal needs and interpretations. It’s a flawed part of being a human being and clinically talking. Such tendencies aren’t rational and help develop the delicate ego, which looks to protect itself at all costs. Facts and verifiable sources are pulled apart, analyzed, and projected for the conscious mind to carry forward into behaviors.
The individual has a narrative, with an inevitable reality they need to have subjectively upheld and ensure that only certain truths are objectified. This is no different for ‘believers’ or ‘skeptics’ who apply the same tactics on either side of the spectrum.
What about the UFO facts?
It’s a fact that these strange UFOs are being picked up on many sensors from the United States military and also by the world’s most advanced defense technology. We can verify that through several Navy Pilots, Intelligence Officers, Radar Operators, Directors of various agencies, and senators updated in classified briefings.
Take the recent UFO/UAP videos in the media. The DoD has determined them to be “Unidentified” in classification. This means that after a careful assessment by an official investigative body, for example, The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force or UAPTF, they have been unable to determine the nature and origin of such anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV).
Here are the new UAP/UFO photographs from Mystery Wire that’s been going viral on Twitter. The U.S. Intelligence Community has known about the mysterious object for two years.
Arguably, the complexity of whatever this AAV/UFO/UAP technology might be may reach far beyond the oversimplified concept of extraterrestrials and into something else, something more alarming. Maybe it’s an effect of nuclear activity, perhaps something genuinely unidentifiable. Maybe something from the multiverse, or perhaps it’s something that the animalistic human mind might not imagine in its original form. Then again, perhaps it’s none of the above.
However, this is all hypothetical. We are stuck in neutral on this UFO topic due to society’s twofold thinking that unfortunately includes renowned scientists tasked with finding “alien” life. Indeed a genuinely scientific approach says, “I don’t know what this UFO phenomenon is, so let’s investigate.”
Instead of taking this topic on what is being reported, the discussion becomes about trying to prove or disprove the stigmatized (ET) extraterrestrial concept rather than focus on likely national security or quantum physics problem, a possible problem of revolutionary technology.
The Pentagon’s UAP
Franc Milburn of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies published this exceptionally insightful assessment of the USG’s new UAP investigation. It’s called “The Pentagon’s UAP Task Force.” And he’s done a meticulous job reviewing the open-source literature and is asking the right questions.
UFO reports in media
When a report on “UFOs” makes the news cycle, more often than not, the well-meaning journalist calls up the sole astrophysicist whose name has become attached to this issue for an uninformed quote.
Regularly, the astrophysicist says it’s all misidentifications, nothing to see here. The “U” in UFO means “Unidentified,” it’s all ballons, birds, and planes while cherry-picking data to create a narrative that we shouldn’t bother with such things.
What might psychology tell us in such cases? Some say that when funding and reputation are put on the line, the mind will create a less hostile version of reality. It is suitable for the status quo but poor for unbiased scientific methodology and arguably a disaster for those seeking possible non-human intelligence.
A new article broke into the Sunday Times with journalist Sarah Baxter making it to page 18 with details of the Pentagon UAP/UFO report. This article, faced with a bleak picture of two people dressed as aliens, was well written and included some of the current issues of UFO/UAP, quoting Harvard scientist Avi Loeb. He has attributed an interest to the (ET) extraterrestrial concept.
But, Baxter failed to mention some of the comments from Navy Pilots and Senators on the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence. My positive critique would be framing the issue, with the undertone hung up on the twofold argument of ETs, rather than stepping back from such premature conclusions.
Overall, it was quite good. I was pleased to see the coverage in a credible British media outlet, and for the first time, it was a promising start into this alternative UFO world. But as Sarah soon will find out over the next two years, it won’t be the last.
Are UFOs/UAPs from China?
Also, I should mention how Chinese technology’s framing would seem to be the following rational and logical explanation for anyone unfamiliar with what has happened over the past three years.
How likely are the claims that ordinary misidentifications are what Navy Pilots are reporting? How accurate is it to think that a foreign advanced technology is responsible for what we are witnessing?
And could the Chinese possess this technology as far back as 2004 without being reported anywhere in the next seventeen years?
A British historian who has investigated and authored articles for The Debrief and UAPMedia. His book on flight aviation within the former Soviet Union has recently got the attention of those working on the UFO/UAP issue. He has written at length about the capabilities and tracking abilities of modern-day fighter planes.
He states that he hasn’t got the actual figures because they’ll be classified. He continues that the FLIR/IRST (InfraRed Search and Track) system and the PIRATE (Passive InfraRed Airborne Track Equipment) produced by the EUROFirst consortium for Eurofighter Typhoon is thought to be able to find stealth aircraft such as the famous B-2 at significant distances. Those flight testing started in 2000 or 2001, and the first Typhoon fitted with PIRATE flew in 2007.
It is essential to keep in mind. We now live in a world where many Navy Pilots have come forward with statements and videos, complete with various Radar Operator’ testimony on multiple sensory data from AN-SPY1 radar and collect data from satellites. All this is according to the former Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe.
US military can now “detect” UAPs
We are talking about sensory detection that is amazingly detailed and sophisticated. And since the 1969 closure of the United States Air Force UFO program, Project Blue Book, the military’s technological capacity to identify objects in sensitive airspace has dramatically increased.
The US military can now detect and track various airborne objects using different sensory information, especially when engaging nuclear strike groups. It’s always astonishing that people think the three things in those blurry UFO/UAP/AAV videos just somehow eluded the military with no tracking as if they flew away without the military knowing what happened to them. It’s unbelievable how many of those people are also unaware those objects were tracked over days rather than minutes.
New advanced radar systems can now detect UFOs
Picture showing the AN/SPY-1 radar antennas are the light grey octagonal panels on the front and starboard side of the superstructure of USS Lake Erie. Credit: Wikipedia.
Available numerical figures on the SPY-1 detection range claim that it can distinguish a golf ball-sized target at ranges above 165 km. When applied to a ballistic missile-sized target, the SPY-1 radar is supposed to have a range of 310 km. All this information according to “Missile Defence Advocacy Agency.”
The military reconnaissance satellites under the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) are so incredibly sophisticated. They can see five inches or more prominent on the ground from space. We are talking particularly incredible surveillance technology backed by hyper-advanced radar systems that trace each of the geographic spheres that are layered up towards space.
Still, here we have three fuzzy, black and white videos from the gun camera footage of the U.S Navy Pilots planes. But that is what’s in the public domain. However, there might be more that is clear and close up. Yet, they are kept in a secret vault somewhere.
UAP/UFO journalist Danny Silva
So when we talk about UFOs that wander into the most surveillance airspace in the world and later leave without any issue or interference and then officially remain classified as “Unidentified,” we are not talking swamp gas, birds, balloons, or the tail end of another plane. The researcher and civilian UAP/UFO journalist Danny Silva implied that Seth Shostak’s opinions aren’t correct.
The Testimony of Dave Fravor on UFOs
Commander Dave Fravor.
We have the famous testimony of Commander Dave Fravor. Mr. Shostack brushing off Commander Fravor’s expert testimony and comparing Navy Jets to Hondas is ludicrous. There is no compelling argument the Tic-Tac UFO is a conventional plane.
Many top mainstream journalists agree the Tic-Tac is either secret black projects, advanced technology, secret programs, the likes of which the world has never seen, or something else. So, moving forward, the public will remain privy to more UAP cases, as we have now seen with the USS. Kidd. It will be tough to continue to deny the reality of advanced technology, no matter where it comes from, in our skies and bodies of water, among other places.
And I would agree, if you want to apply subjective Occam’s Razor, arguably look to newly advanced Chinese technology, not planes which DOD can identify instantly.
Nevertheless, keep in mind Occam’s Razor is highly dependent on the information available to you. Given the reports, we highly likely aren’t talking about the next advancement of the F-18. We are discussing technology so radical it has mastered trans-medium travel, anti-gravity, and hypersonic dead-stop propulsion. Look to the AATIP five observables for a proper understanding of such UFO technological capabilities.
The red-taped, bureaucratic UFO dogma
Currently, we are red-taped, lost in bureaucratic dogma that stops progression. The lack of detailed classification regarding these specific UAP vehicles is problematic. UFO/UAP can mean anything from a drone, balloon, planes, birds, missiles, or anything that seemingly flies.
There is nothing to distinguish objects seen in the famous GIMBAL video from the FLIR1. The absence of specification allows for misinformation to spread, thriving in the uncertainty and lack of transparency to force their narrative.
To guarantee we sidestep unhelpful opinions from misinformed scientists and radicalized YouTube debunkers, we must assure we don’t conclude without all the relevant data. Equivalently, we mustn’t name the phenomenon as one thing or another without a full government investigation.
Luis Elizondo former director of AATIP
Luis Elizondo.
The former Director of the Pentagon program (AATIP), Luis Elizondo, was asked about the breakdown in the scientific process regarding UFO/AAV/UAP technology.
He said that his great respect for the scientific community could not be overstated. Thus, he continues, so AATIP had some of the best in conducting the analysis, scientific modeling, and mathematical computations. He finds it egregious when some well-known scientific community scientists display unwarranted intellectual arrogance on a topic they have no idea about. He also said, rather than allowing the scientific method to speak for itself, they muzzle her and talk for her. So it amazes Luis how in breath, someone claims to look for signs of ET life in the solar system but is unwilling to look right under their noses. He states that it seems to him to be a bit hypocritical.
The term “Advanced Aerospace Vehicles” (AAV)
The question is now how to manage such misinformation? And from now on, the obvious answer is the transparency of government data and ending the secrecy. Moreover, it has been suggested that the term UAP or UFO is replaced with something that represents the genuine bizarre nature of the phenomenon and the observed technology and the genuinely unidentifiable quality that separates the misidentified UAPs from the identifiable.
Furthermore, when the intelligence agents provided information to The New York Times last summer (2020), they used the term Advanced Aerospace Vehicles (AAV). Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough quickly squashed to Swedish researcher Roger Glassel, who said that AAV was not an official Navy term. It was possibly the contractor BAASS that complied with the Nimitz Incident report for AATIP.
She was assuring the discussion of AAV, and the concept of unidentifiable craft stopped in its tracks. The Pentagon did not want to allow that unidentifiable ideology to exist under their ruling. Some will claim this was a strategic move, given that the USS. Nimitz Incident report released in 2018 by reporter George Knapp used the term AAV – shut down AAV and shut down the Nimitz Incident report.
Moreover, AAV was a term associated with the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) contractors, as it was reported by The New York Times in July 2020.
Provided the New York Times a series of unclassified slides revealing that the secret program took this seriously to include it in numerous briefings. One slide states one of the program’s tasks was to “arrange for access to Data/reports/ materials from crash retrievals of AAVs,” or advanced aerospace vehicles. New York Times sources told them that “AAV” does not refer to vehicles made in any country. Not Russian or Chinese, but it is used to mean technology in the truly unexplained realm. They also assure that their briefings are based on facts, not belief.
The mainstream media has been aware oF UFO/UAP
The recent comments of John Lee Ratcliffe, an American politician and attorney who worked as the Director of National Intelligence from 2020 to 2021, the mainstream media, have been aware that UFO/UAP is being taken seriously by the DOD with a report due to the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence (SSCI) in summer 2021.
And with public pressure and people now knowing the UFO/UAP technology reality, that might prove disastrous should DoD try to cover it up at this point.
Senators on the records and their conclusion
Senators Marco Rubio and Warner have gone on record to verify the Navy pilot’s reports stating that they do not know what is flying around nuclear strike groups.
A severe issue to national security was that the Pentagon established an inter-agency Task Force (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force) that was created to investigate UAP/UFOs and compile the much-anticipated report to congress. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force is taking into consideration all possibilities. Even those who are burdened with psychological stigma and pushback.
But with everything happening right now, we need to be cautious. Because not everyone is willing to accept UAP, UFO, or AAV as a reality, the only possible way forward is data transparency, reducing the wriggle room for intellectual dishonesty. It all starts with ending UFO/UAP secrecy within society and government.
Should the search for extraterrestrial life in the universe come up empty-handed, it might be worth checking in on a neighboring universe instead. According to a pair of studies in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, there’s a fair chance that life-fostering planets could exist in a parallel universe.
The notion that the universe is just one of many, perhaps infinite, other universes is known as the multiverse theory. Experts have previously thought that such parallel universes if they exist, would have to meet a stringent set of criteria to allow for the formation of stars, galaxies, and life-fostering planets like those seen in our universe.
Researchers ran a massive computer simulation in the new study to build new universes under various starting conditions. They found that life conditions might be a little broader than previously thought.
Posted on
UFO Disclosure | “Drones” Instead of UAPs – Luis Elizondo
This article brings up the UFO conversation we need today and the wording used in this topic. They now use the words “Drones” before UAP due to the stigma, according to Luis. The UAP enigma progress will continue, and hopefully, this summer, we will get some new answers. The clip is from the interview between Elizondo and Cristina Gomez.
“Drones” Instead of UAPs
According to Elizondo, they were called drones simply because they didn’t want to say the word “UAP.” They didn’t want to freak people out because they know that the deck logs are releasable to the freedom of information act.
Moreover, Luis suspects that someone said, look, if you see any lights in the sky, you better write down the word drone, do not write the word “UAP” because that’s going to get released. It’s going to be a bad day for the military in the press, so they should only use the word “drones” when talking about UAPs.
“The UFO disclosure is progress, not an event.”
According to Luis, many people are working on this UFO topic, some directly and some indirectly. There are also collaborations between countries around the world on the UFO enigma. It’s because it’s a global issue and not only a U.S. issue, according to Elizondo. So, UFOs are an issue that involves the whole of humanity.
Are they from Earth or another world?
Our five senses, sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch, don’t let us interact with our surroundings that the UFOs might use. All this due to we only use our five senses. This might explain these UAPs might be interdimensional, and that’s why we never see them. So the questions should not be asked if they are from Earth or another planet. These UFOs might have always been here. And to ask these questions, we need more data, according to Luis.
➡ You love searching for the truth. So do I. Let’s uncover it together.
I aim to promote and encourage accurate, objective examination of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), commonly known as Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). I seek to share credible data with the public with these short UFO clips. Please share these videos with friends, and please leave a comment below the video clip.
