The Zodiac Killer, an unidentified serial killer who terrorized the San Francisco Bay Area in the late 1960s and early 1970s, remains one of America's most infamous unsolved cases. The mystery surrounding his identity is further complicated by the varying physical descriptions provided by eyewitnesses.
It is important to note that eyewitness recollection is notoriously unreliable. Discrepancies are common in investigations, as people often make mistakes when attempting to accurately recall facial features, hair color, height, weight, clothing, and other aspects of a suspect’s appearance. Sometimes, eyewitnesses and victims of crime positively identify an individual as the perpetrator, only to discover later that they were wrong when the real culprit was identified.
The Zodiac attacked three couples and a cab driver in Benicia, Vallejo, unincorporated Napa County, and the city of San Francisco.
Police and investigators concur The Zodiac attacked seven people on four occasions in California:
- Betty Lou Jensen (16) and David Arthur Faraday (17) on December 20, 1968,
- Michael Renault Mageau (19) and Darlene Elizabeth Ferrin (22) on July 4 and 5, 1969,
- Bryan Calvin Hartnell (20) and Cecelia Ann Shepard (22) on September 27, 1969,
- Paul Stine on October 11, 1969.
Contradictory Accounts and Descriptions
The varying descriptions of the Zodiac lead some to believe that more than one person was involved in the crimes. However, it’s important to remember that these discrepancies are common occurrences in most investigations.
Read also: Interpreting Blood Dreams
Blue Rock Springs Park Shooting
Michael Mageau, who survived being shot at Blue Rock Springs Park on July 4, 1969, described the suspect as a white male, approximately 5'8" tall, with a heavy, "beefy" build, weighing around 195-200 pounds or more. He noted short, curly, light brown, almost blond hair. Mageau also stated that the killer wore dark clothes and no glasses.
Mageau gave conflicting accounts on whether Ferrin knew her killer. At the hospital, he stated he did not know the murderer. At another point, he said the assailant's name was "Richard".
Blue Rock Springs Park
Lake Berryessa Stabbing
Bryan Hartnell, who survived the brutal stabbing at Lake Berryessa on September 27, 1969, described only clip-on sunglasses. Five other witnesses by the shores of Berryessa that day, equally described a suspicious man without eyeglasses.
Hartnell stated that the attacker had brown hair and when asked to explain he said, Cause I saw it from where the goggles fit... I looked so closely to find out. And when he turned you know they kind of flittered... I could see his hair. It looked kinda greasy. Bryan told me, I remember when I was first talked to, I mean, I had the guy being a walrus, you know... He had one of those Sears-type of jackets, you know, those can be either lined or unlined, and if its lined, a person could be thin, if its unlined the person would be heavy...
Read also: Decoding Common Dreams
Lake Berryessa
Earlier that day, a suspicious man had been seen around Lake Berryessa by several people. Since they had potentially seen the Zodiac without his hood, the women worked with Napa Valley Register photographer Robert McKenzie to create a composite sketch using an Identi-Kit facial compositing device. The sketch of the man seen at Lake Berryessa before the attack on September 27, 1969, depicted a Caucasian male adult with a round face and dark hair.
The girls who helped to produce this sketch described this man to investigators as a white male, between 28-30 years of age, with dark hair that was parted on the left side, at least six feet tall, stocky build, approx. 200 to 225 lbs., with a round face, rounded eyes, thin lips, a medium nose, straight eyebrows and small ears. The girls also said that the man was nice looking, wearing dark pants and a dark, short-sleeved sweater shirt over an untucked white undershirt. The man had medium color skin, and was not wearing glasses.
Presidio Heights Murder
The most infamous sketch of the killer was compiled from eyewitness recollections in the immediate aftermath of the Paul Stine murder on October 11, 1969. Three teenagers witnessed the crime from a house directly across the street from Stine's cab. The Zodiac's face was clearly visible by streetlight. The teenagers watched as the Zodiac wiped down the vehicle and rifled through Stine's clothes.
The teenagers described the criminal as a "husky" white man in a "dark or black jacket". The suspect at the Stine scene was said to have brown or blond hair, possibly with a red tint.Just two minutes after the call to SFPD, two nearby patrol officers responded to the radio dispatch. They encountered a white man in dark clothes walking north towards the Presidio army base. They pulled alongside the man and asked if he had seen anything suspicious. The man confirmed he had seen someone waving a gun and heading east. The officers hurried away.
Read also: Understanding Mercy as a Gift
1969: The suspect that was observed by officer Fouke was a WMA 35-45 Yrs about five-foot, ten inches, 180-200 pounds. Medium heavy build- Barrel chested- Medium complexion- Light-colored hair possibly greying in rear (May have been lighting that caused this effect.) Crew cut- wearing glasses- Dressed in dark blue waist length zipper type jacket (Navy or royal blue) Elastic cuffs and waist band zipped part way up. Brown wool pants pleated type baggy in rear (Rust brown) May have been wearing low cut shoes. Subject at no time appeared to be in a hurry walking with a shuffling lope, Slightly bent forward.
October 1969 SFPD poster featuring initial sketch made from the teenagers' description (left), and one based on the officers' description of the man they encountered (right).
The two patrol officers who questioned the witness near the scene realized it may have been the Zodiac.
Analysis of Discrepancies
Mageau described the killer as 5 feet 8 inches tall while Fouke said the suspect was approximately five feet ten inches tall. Fouke and Mageau were both seated in vehicles at the time; Fouke saw the suspect from a distance and Mageau saw the shooter just outside the car.
Estimates regarding the killer’s age demonstrate that witnesses often have great difficulty when judging age due to subjectivity. Younger witnesses often over-estimate the age of older individuals, and everyone judges the age of others based mostly on appearance.
Assuming that all of the witnesses were describing the same individual, we must also assume that they were all mistaken regarding his age. If the girls at the lake saw the Zodiac before he donned his hooded costume, then the lowest age estimate for the killer is mid-to-late twenties, while Stine witnesses believed that the suspect was almost two decades older, in his early-to-mid forties.
Even a younger man with a receding hairline can appear much older. The Zodiac stated that he only resembled this composite sketch when he was committing his crimes. If the man seen at the lake became concerned after police released a composite sketch which did resemble him, he might have decided to drastically change his appearance by getting a crewcut.
If all of these witnesses were describing the same individual, the killer may have been much younger than described in most accounts.
No one knows if the Zodiac was attempting to disguise his voice.
By compiling the available information and reconciling the various descriptions, a portrait emerges, suggesting that the Zodiac may have been as young as 28 years old, or as old as 35 to 40 years old. His weight cannot be known, as the range provided by witnesses spans from 180 to 220 lbs; he may have weighed even less than the witnesses believed. He had brownish, possibly reddish hair, and stood somewhere between 5'8" and 6".
The Case of Arthur Leigh Allen
Michael Mageau reportedly identified suspect Arthur Leigh Allen, yet this witness also indicated that the attackers face resembled that of another suspect in the police photo line-up. Mageau had only seen the shooter for a brief instant from a profile view. During the shooting, the suspect flashed a bright light at Mageau and then shot him in the jaw.
Vallejo police detective John Lynch interviewed Allen on October 6, 1969, and described the suspect as a WMA 35 years... 6'1", 241[lbs], heavy build and is bald. In July 1969, Mageau described his attacker as a WMA, short, possible 58, was real heavy set, beefy build... not blubbery fat, but real beefy, possibly 195 to 200 [lbs] or maybe even larger... short curly hair, light brown almost blond...
Possible Zodiac victim Kathleen Johns identified suspect Larry Kane as the man who tried to abduct her in March 1970.
Many critics have noted that the Zodiac description did not match Larry Kane, and that Johns first identified the Zodiac as her abductor when looking at the composite sketch of the Stine suspect.
Table of Eyewitness Descriptions
| Witness/Source | Description |
|---|---|
| Michael Mageau (Blue Rock Springs) | White male, 5'8", heavy build (195-200 lbs), short curly light brown/blond hair, dark clothes, no glasses |
| Bryan Hartnell (Lake Berryessa) | Brown hair, greasy |
| Lake Berryessa Witnesses | White male, 28-30 years old, dark hair parted on the left, 6 feet tall, stocky build (200-225 lbs), round face, medium color skin, no glasses |
| Teenage Witnesses (Paul Stine Murder) | "Husky" white man, dark or black jacket |
| Officer Fouke (Presidio Heights) | White male, 35-45 years, 5'10", 180-200 lbs, medium heavy build, medium complexion, light-colored hair (possibly graying), crew cut, wearing glasses, dark blue jacket, brown wool pants |